Mail Archive Search: <+from:knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:knormoyle@surfnetusa.com: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL SS Contest Trend Analysis (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:42:21 -0800; Hi Rick, Seems like there's an assumption that a different distribution of "first license" dates would imply something about growth or death of contesting. Actually a flat distribution could be a bad; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00659.html (8,176 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] other times (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:38:47 -0800; In reading the rules for contests, it seems like the time from the start of the contest to your first q, and the time from your last q to the end of the contest, is never addressed, but that there is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00090.html (7,736 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] other times (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:21:10 -0800; here's my specific example. ARRL RTTY Roundup says off times must be min 30 minutes, and you have to take the off time in two blocks at most. Assume you start 15 minutes late, and end 15 minutes earl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00096.html (7,983 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Operations in Contest (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:22:38 -0700; it's readily accepted that people who don't live in DX countries, set up stations there and travel there to operate during contests. Obviously a lot of work to pull that off, so kudos to them. Seems; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00405.html (8,623 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] What's the station? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:41:20 -0700; In thinking about how to design an optimal remote station, one things about the minimal amount of information bandwidth that needs to be moved back and forth, in order to minimize latency. So then yo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00421.html (7,869 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:32:52 -0700; It would be a lot simpler if the rules were changed to just say all receiving and transmitting antennas had to be in the 500 meter circle, and let physics determine what else needs to be close to the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00544.html (11,574 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:13:13 -0700; Good point Joe. and Good point Hank. Good point Craig. I think one good side-effect of the 175 mile limit is it forces clubs to recruit actively in their area, which is good for contesting. But it's; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00376.html (12,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]