Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kq2m@kq2m.com: 159 ]

Total 159 documents matching your query.

141. [CQ-Contest] KQ2M 50th Anniversary today! (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:37:49 -0500
On August 10, 1973, I received my Novice license and called my first CQ. (You were supposed to log your CQ's back then and I dutifully logged my first CQ on 80 M. LOL!) 50 years, all 340 countries an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00018.html (7,049 bytes)

142. [CQ-Contest] YCCC SO2R Box and 2 computers? (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 13:16:06 -0500
Hi, Does anyone know if the YCCC SO2R Box can successfully support 2 computers in an SO2R configuration? I have already asked several knowledgeable people and they are not sure. The SO2R mini can NOT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00119.html (6,821 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] YCCC SO2R Box and 2 computers? (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 06:43:32 -0500
John, Thank you for your response and information. I wanted to do this on both CW and SSB, and thought that 2 YCCC SO2R boxes might work as you suggested, but a few SO2R guys familiar with the YCCC S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00124.html (8,604 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] YCCC SO2R Box and 2 computers? (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 18:29:55 -0500
Hi Dick, Thank you for your email. That is fantastic information and I believe that is EXACTLY what I am looking for! I need to read your reply again and reflect on the options that you have laid out
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00127.html (14,081 bytes)

145. [CQ-Contest] YCCC SO2R BOX (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:01:19 -0500
Hi, I am looking to buy one ORIGINAL YCCC SO2R box (NOT the SO2R Mini) in excellent working condition. Does anyone have one that they are willing to part with? Please email me OFF-LIST with price and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00133.html (6,489 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rate Record (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:47:58 -0500
Congrats to Manu! In the 2023 CQWWSSB I broke the 60 minute US rate record - most qso's ever made by a single op while operating stateside - this past weekend as KQ2M. KQ2M made 330 qso's in 60 minut
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-10/msg00108.html (8,511 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rate Record (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:20:23 -0500
Very cool George. Yes, I was talking about the CQWW DX Contests, but thank you for sending that link. Up until now I never knew that the CQWW and CQWPX websites had Top Rates pages, for both modes an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00002.html (8,221 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] RST? (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:25:49 -0600
I can only speak for myself, but any time I work someone outside of a contest, I always give an accurate RST even when it might be hard to copy. I feel that an accurate RST conveys meaningful informa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00080.html (8,786 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] cw speed (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2023 16:43:23 -0600
Hi Martin, The simple answer to your question is "It depends". I will give the perspective of a contest opr. focused on making the best score possible. A top level op is evaluating everything, second
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-12/msg00007.html (14,285 bytes)

150. [CQ-Contest] Most cost-effective sending of qsl's direct to qsl bureaus via delivery services (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:56:14 -0600
Hi All, I have a total of several thousand qsl's from contest qso's that I need to send out to about 20 different country QSL bureaus. DL, EA, F, G, I, JA, ON, SP, etc. For countries where I have onl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-01/msg00045.html (8,069 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQMM DX Contest unwritten rule (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:28:10 -0600
Yuri, Years ago, when WAEDC switched to a 24 hour format, I thought that was ridiculous and said so, and I stopped operating in it until they changed the rules back to allow 36 hours operating time a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00100.html (14,158 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:43:43 -0600
On many occasions during ARRLDXCW I was using my FT1000MP with a PAIR of 250khz filters and then adding the Notch filter (manually tuning back and forth), IPO and shift/width (manually tuning back an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00154.html (16,187 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW LCR "incorrect call" (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:24:19 -0600
Hi Mike, Yes, this IS annoying. My experience has been that in a large % of cases, I actually have to KNOW that the callsign is incorrect in order to repeat their call with ? and then hope that they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00171.html (11,946 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:10:53 -0500
A year ago, I cited and took issue with a well-known contester in New England who was self-spotting in a DX contest under a foreign call. It was disingenuous at best, as well as being unnecessary. An
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00058.html (11,145 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:47:16 -0500
Hi Paul, Not to change the subject but, if "All required elements of a contact must be exchanged via amateur radio.", then how do contacts made via remote qualify? Is the internet considered to be Am
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00089.html (12,010 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:15:28 -0500
WOW Paul - what a truly disappointing response! First, the ARRL, when whomever decided unilaterally to treat remote the same as just using a keyer, they did so without ANY open discussion with the co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00095.html (14,715 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] Connected but not assisted (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:22:19 -0500
JP, If you are going to quote me, then at least make a good-faith attempt to get it right. from my previous post: "First, the ARRL, when whomever decided unilaterally to treat remote the same as just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00120.html (12,412 bytes)

158. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:43:43 -0500
Paul, Your response was disappointing because it ignored what I wrote previously and your follow-up reply (cited below) also ignored what I objected, to in detail. It was obvious that you either didn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00121.html (19,138 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] EARTHQUAKE! (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 09:56:52 -0500
Initially magnitude 5.5 but has been downgraded to 4.7, according to the USGS centered in NJ While I was typing an email, I experienced strong and very rapid shaking with a low rumbling outside, for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-04/msg00018.html (7,282 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu