Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ku7y.cw@gmail.com: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing, not (score: 1)
Author: Monte Stark <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:03:51 -0800
There is an easy cure..... Just require the call to be part of the exchange. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y Northern California Contest Club CWOps #1211 ku7y@qsl.net http:\\www.hatpinsandmore.com ___
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00091.html (6,556 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 19:50:53 -0700
If all contest exchanges just required each call sign to be sent we would not need this debate. :-) OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y Arizona Outlaws Contest Club Northern California Contest Club ku7y@q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00123.html (8,514 bytes)

63. [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 07:48:39 -0800
I think SO2R and SO1R should be in different classes. I admire the skills those SO2R operators have and appreciate the investment they have made both in equipment and in the time needed to learn to t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00015.html (9,061 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 19:20:17 -0800
Hi Steve, You make a very good point. Just to make something clear. I do not have the operating skills to post a winning score in any big contest, even if I had the radios and antennas that would be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00053.html (10,742 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] The "high and mighty" syndrome on display (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:12:01 -0800
This brings up a question I've had for years..... When I call a running station and they have a hard time copying me and keep asking for my call, maybe 3 or 4 times, I feel like a lid for breaking t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00390.html (8,600 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:15:32 -0500
Interesting discussion. I can understand why some people do not want to post all their data. What would be wrong with only showing the total score in real time, or near real time? This would not be g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00154.html (10,479 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] Sending in a Check Log (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 17:32:47 -0500
I sent a log in as a check log a few years ago. Here's why: I had a TS930. No connection to the computer. Not sure which contest it was but think it may have been WPX CW. Anyway I was on 20m. I'd swi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00054.html (7,594 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending in a check log (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:15:24 -0500
I sure hope it didn't do that. The log checker for that contest said that he would note my band error and not NIL people. And he did say that he wanted the check log. I trust that he did the right th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00060.html (7,885 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 21:18:08 -0500
provides call sign or multiplier identification along with frequency information to the operator. me so I am confident I am not >> cheating if I claim Unassisted. The way I read the rule is a bit di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00235.html (8,827 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 15:42:07 -0500
Hi Steve, I agree with what you say in that 17m example.... until you get to the last line. Here is why I disagree about checking your own callsign on something like the RBN during a contest. If you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00248.html (11,992 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 06:28:14 -0500
During a 2 year period I did 6 contests on 160m, 2 ARRL, 2 Stew Perry and 2 CQ 160m. Each contest I heard MS and the only NE state I needed but never could get so much as a ? from any of them! That w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00452.html (10,341 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 20:43:50 -0500
I agree with you Jukka, What's in the log, is what stays in the log. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y Arizona Outlaws Contest Club Northern California Contest Club Silver Springs, NV ku7y@qsl.net my __
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00030.html (8,850 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 20:15:53 -0500
When we lived in ID several of us would get together each week or so and talk about DX. One time someone mentioned they got a DX QSL that was blank.... no QSO data filled in. There was a note to plea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00049.html (11,566 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Gauge of Radial Wire (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:20:36 -0500
One time several years and QTH's ago I had a few thousand feet of very small enamel coated wire. Must have been about number 32 or so. I used that for radials on my 40m phased verticals in Idaho and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00299.html (9,219 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs... (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:44:57 -0800
Not sure how the shipping would be to you in Cuba but Max-Gain Systems, mgs4u.com/UHF.htm#UHFmale_solderon has the right connectors for RG-6 along with almost any other type of coax you have. OK, bac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00114.html (9,496 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:29:42 -0800
The reasons I have for liking the NAQP might be a bit different than some, but here they are: Because it's a NA based contest those of us who don't have big antenna systems and/or don't live around t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00151.html (9,639 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your DX Spots during the ARRL SSB DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:35:24 -0800
3.2. Single Operator Unlimited: The use of spotting assistance or automated, multi-channel decoders is permitted. 3.2.1. Low Power: 150 watts transmitter output or less. 3.2.2. High Power: Maximum t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00062.html (11,776 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:54:06 -0700
You're not the only one who feels that way Tony, I've said for a long time that SO1R and SO2R should be separate classes. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y Arizona Outlaws Contest Club Northern Californ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00109.html (10,956 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:50:49 -0700
Hi Rudy, just in knowing when to do things like change bands. And many multipliers were found on the 2nd band that I would not have otherwise worked. And I am not a skilled SO2R op. panadaptors it's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00127.html (14,580 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] All the Assisted ops, where do they all come from? (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 13:50:00 -0700
you He should be DQed because someone spotted him? (Isn't claiming unassisted when using assistance grounds for a DQ?) That's such a ridicules idea that it can't be anything but a joke. Right? OK, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00161.html (9,706 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu