Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ku8e@ku8e.com: 279 ]

Total 279 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:29:37 -0400
I agree Randy. How in the world would you enforce this rule? If you want to social distance just don't allow any multi-op's this year.JeffSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00114.html (11,450 bytes)

162. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:45:05 -0400
John, That's not really a very good analogy. A rule like this isn't really enforceable. How do you prove someone is conducing their multi-op in this way?  We all know COVID is a much debated issue. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00126.html (10,941 bytes)

163. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:57:33 -0400
If someone wants to do a multi-op and remote to a specific station location it's pretty easy to setup. I operated WX6V's station remotely (from GA) in CA in the CQP this year. I got his station setup
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00127.html (17,798 bytes)

164. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:58:04 -0400
Why make this decision four months before the contest? I think some of these contest sponsors think everyone lives in the dark ages and depends on printed media for information. This could be communi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00143.html (14,258 bytes)

165. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:09:40 -0400
"Who will enforce this rule?" You guys will. Will somebody figure out a way to game the system? Most likely. There's no big prize money here, and the vast majority of radiosport enthusiasts are hones
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00144.html (10,381 bytes)

166. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 00:19:02 -0400
Mike, Because you are an ARRL Director it probably would've been a good idea for you to just stay out of this discussion. You're sharing information that only someone who is on the PSC or an ARRL Dir
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00152.html (15,035 bytes)

167. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:25:26 -0400
Field Day isn't a contest Look at the CQWW results on 3830 this year. Probably just going to be team RHR and a couple of others, and maybe some who entered M/M to free themselves from M/S rules. Is t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00158.html (13,240 bytes)

168. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:03:51 -0400
Ria, I don't understand why you are focusing so much on M/M?  They are a very small percentage of the entities in just about every DX contest? Do the rules have to be written to appease them?  M/S an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00172.html (13,745 bytes)

169. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:58:57 -0400
Ria, You are making the assumption that MM operations have the most operators. That's not true. With lockouts, in-band radios on run band and a radio on every band you aren't running on all the time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00180.html (16,042 bytes)

170. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ve8 Mult (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 13:52:50 -0500
It would be nice if the guys who operate from VE8 or VY1 would just go around and call stations. Since VY1AAA and VY1JA are gone we are left with stations that aren't really seasoned contesters. They
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00023.html (7,907 bytes)

171. Re: [CQ-Contest] Delayed results (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:26:17 -0500
I was hoping with as divided as our country is right now that politics would stay off this reflector. It's seems to have invaded our life's in everything we do for personal enjoyment such as entertai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00027.html (9,349 bytes)

172. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:31:48 -0500
Current WPX Rule: /3. Classic Operator (CLASSIC): The entrant will use only one radio, no QSO finding assistance, and the one radio must not be able to receive while transmitting. Operator Assisted e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00107.html (10,314 bytes)

173. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:53:58 -0500
And that wasn't a very good idea either.... On 11/16/2020 02:38 PM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote: "The 2021 CQ WW WPX RTTY, SSB and CW contests will include a new Multi-Transmitter Distributed category. S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00109.html (13,590 bytes)

174. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:45:39 -0500
Jukka But only 24 hours. They haven't updated the CQ WPX webpage yet. Jeff Behold! - - - VI. ENTRY CATEGORIES: A. Single Operator Categories:One person (the operator) performs all operating and loggi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00114.html (12,486 bytes)

175. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:58:07 -0500
Why even bother to have a distributed category?  It's so EASY to setup one station to remote into. In fact I did it with someone in CA who wasn't even setup as a remote station beforehand for the Cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00115.html (14,036 bytes)

176. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:16:42 -0500
Ed, I think you're right since WPX is more of a run contest because everyone can work everyone. Multipliers are important but most find you when you're running. Here are some stats I calculated using
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00117.html (10,246 bytes)

177. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:16:08 -0500
Bud,With all due respect I checked the CQ WPX database for the 2020 contests for both modes and there were more SO unassisted entries on both modes then there were for SO assisted . In fact on SSB th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00129.html (9,448 bytes)

178. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:06:43 -0500
MartyWhat good is that unless you want to be a PT contester? They would only count your first 24 hours and that's what would be published in the results.JeffSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smart
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00147.html (15,420 bytes)

179. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Single Op Rules (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:09:08 -0500
"The Classic Overlay Category was reduced from 36 hours to 24 hours, after the inaugural run in 2020, to make it consistent with the Classic Category duration in CQ WW. I believe this is sound as man
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00166.html (8,993 bytes)

180. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:48:27 -0500
Dick, If that's the case then why don't they just get rid of the SOA category instead of the SOU category? My good friend KR2Q knows that I backup my statements with numbers.  Mine come from the CQ W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00185.html (19,088 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu