Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ku8e@ku8e.com: 279 ]

Total 279 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:34:52 -0500
The cheaters out there won. They will find another way to cheat now they now don't have to worry about being detected using assistance. Jeff Thank you all for your inputs.  I have my convictions on t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00220.html (10,861 bytes)

182. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:56:29 -0500
I think some of the more serious elite operators like SOU because they feel a sense of accomplishment that they pushed their operating skills to the limit without help from anyone. Add spots to that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00236.html (22,182 bytes)

183. Re: [CQ-Contest] Issue while submitting CQWWDXCW log (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:37:46 -0500
JohnI got this message as well but it still accepted my log. That's OK or do I need to resubmit. JeffSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original message --From: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00296.html (9,083 bytes)

184. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beat packet pileups-a solution ! QZB (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:13:45 -0500
Mike,I personally experienced what you described this weekend.  I got on the air remotely on Saturday night as PJ4/KU8E after PJ4A (K4BAI) was finished for the day on 15 meters. I purposely went high
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00007.html (11,510 bytes)

185. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is a Great Contest - YES IT IS! (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 20:47:55 -0500
The west coast isn't all that bad if you pick the right category. See results below for 40 meter single band in 2019. W7WA and other west coast stations have regularly won this category on SSB and so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00030.html (11,481 bytes)

186. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is a Great Contest -- NOT (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 19:04:37 -0500
Just because someone wants to operate remotely doesn't make them any lesser of an operator. In fact I would make the argument that someone operating at home has an advantage over someone that is oper
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00073.html (10,363 bytes)

187. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is an unfair Contest -- A solutiion! (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:11:47 -0500
JimIt's pretty impossible to change rules to make contests fair for everyone. If you want to win that badly you just need to go to places where you have some type of competitive advantage. That's why
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00085.html (11,095 bytes)

188. Re: [CQ-Contest] K8CC SK (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 13:29:19 -0500
Sorry to hear about Dave. He was one of the most enthusiastic members of the Mad River Radio Club back in the 1980's and 1990's. I lost count how many times he was president. I operated contests from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00200.html (9,361 bytes)

189. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb Sprint time changes (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:52:38 -0500
Why not in the future have an experiment and have the Sprint be 160-80-40 meters?I agree starting an hour earlier will give more advantage to the west coast.JeffSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00011.html (20,418 bytes)

190. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb Sprint time changes (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:27:56 -0500
RayLook back at past results for the February CW Sprint. Just about every year at least 7 of the top 10 stations in the High Power category are either on the west coast, Texas, NM or Colorado. For th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00013.html (22,717 bytes)

191. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Single Band Unlimited (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:55:40 -0500
Wouldn't that translate to that someone who does Single-Op Unlimited OR Single-Op Unassisted can be either All band or Single Band?  Maybe they have a typo because you can't be Single-Op Unlimited an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00108.html (7,819 bytes)

192. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Single Band Unlimited (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:57:38 -0500
The ARRL sure would make things simpler by getting rid of the "General Rules for All ARRL Contests" document. You sometimes need to look in two places - the rules for the specific contest and the Gen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00116.html (9,924 bytes)

193. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Single Band Unlimited (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:41:02 -0500
How about adding low and high band single-op categories in ARRL DX like they used to have years ago? Low band - 160, 80 and 40 meters High band - 20, 15, 10 meters You could keep the single band cate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00129.html (9,289 bytes)

194. Re: [CQ-Contest] The 2021 Unassisted Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:29:40 -0500
Many newer contesters don't know any other way to operate a contest than operating assisted. They spend every contest just pointing and clicking on spots, which doesn't really involve any skills at a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00041.html (14,498 bytes)

195. Re: [CQ-Contest] The 2021 Unassisted Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:12:32 -0500
Martin, You're taking what I said out of context. Note I said "new" contester not "experienced" contester. A new contester isn't going to be running two frequencies (like you gave in your example) an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00047.html (19,086 bytes)

196. Re: [CQ-Contest] The 2021 Unassisted Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 13:32:26 -0400
Martin, I don't think SOAB is dominated by 2BSIQ. My guess is only a handful (mostly the top 5 in each SOAB HP category) operate this way. The rest are operating the traditional way or SO2R where the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00055.html (25,386 bytes)

197. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Multi-Distributed (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:24:08 -0400
Ray, No disrespect to all my good friends at PJ2T but they're hardly pushing the envelope remotely. I think the 2021 ARRL DX CW was the first contest they ever did remotely as a multi-op. In the past
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00063.html (11,538 bytes)

198. Re: [CQ-Contest] The 2021 Unassisted Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:31:51 -0400
Unfortunately all the rules for just about every major contest are written for the benefit of those on the east coast corridor. For the rest of us in flyover county if we make a suggestion our ideas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00064.html (21,429 bytes)

199. Re: [CQ-Contest] The 2021 Unassisted Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 23:10:02 -0400
Dimitri, I think the point he was trying to make was about the ARRL DX Contest. In the past you were allowed one run radio and multiplier station(s) with a 10 minute rule. Now you are only allowed on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00069.html (28,257 bytes)

200. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Multi-Distributed (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:52:25 -0400
Unfortunately PJ2T can't have an unmanned remote station in Curacao because of the regulations governing remote operating. If the regulations were like they are in Bonaire they probably would've been
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00076.html (13,389 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu