Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kucelin@yahoo.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW 2011 WITHDRAWN lOGS. (Was Marathon Cheating) (score: 1)
Author: Davor Kucelin <kucelin@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
I see also double standards. In 2008 CQWW CW contest CC did DQ lot of us for moving some qso times. For exapmple just 12 qsos in 2008 ment DQ. Nowdays moving lot of qsos is just yellow card. Wonder w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00191.html (7,631 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
Author: Davor Kucelin <kucelin@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 01:50:45 -0800 (PST)
What about: 1 point for qsos with own country 2 points for qsos in your continent or with own country but in different CQ zone, 4 points for qsos with other continent DX contacts still count a lot, o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00192.html (9,529 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] I loved the WPX - missing 10 min MS rule (score: 1)
Author: Davor Kucelin <kucelin@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Fully agree with Braco and others, M/S was much more fun with 10min rule. 73 Dave 9A1UN one of 9A1P, 9A22P, 9A33P in wpx's _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00106.html (7,871 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S 10min rule (score: 1)
Author: Davor Kucelin <kucelin@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Seems like most of the current top multi single stations would like to get the old 10min rule back. Wonder if someone can make a survey about it to usual multiop entrants, I think the wast majority w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00137.html (7,084 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu