Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lu5dx@lucg.com.ar: 268 ]

Total 268 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] : Reverse beacon of my own call? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:49:13 -0300
Bob. There is no need for an exception. Since the rules mention RBN in this case being used for a very specific use: QSO Alerting Assistance. The term RBN so clearly being bound to VIII, restricts it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00282.html (22,428 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Lock-out box details now uploaded to my website - 73! Bill, N3RR (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:18:58 -0300
Hi Bill. Email came in empty. I guess this is the link: http://users.erols.com/n3rr/so2r/index.htm 73. Martin, LU5DX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00326.html (7,847 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC bands and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 18:59:32 -0300
Hmm. I guess we cannot suggest to non-contesters what bands to use. Neither we can expect them to use certain bands (in this case the WARC bands). They "owe" the ham radio spectrum in the same propor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-08/msg00026.html (14,211 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] NILs hurt (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 23:33:25 -0300
Hey Barry. I think calling idiots to those who eventually send B4 or DUPE or QSO B4 is a bit too much. Most of us work dupes without even worrying about it. BUT (and this is a big BUT), there are qui
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00055.html (12,189 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re-thinking Asia and contests (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:40:40 -0300
It would be very, better said, VERY difficult if not impossible, to balance all the situations across the globe. For example, here in LU, CX, CE we are certainly not favored at all from 160 through 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00201.html (9,371 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC-2014 Selection Areas (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 02:17:14 -0200
This is a great and solid explanation and I truly believe it is the foundation for the overall great quality of operators (both TLs and TMs) for WRTC 2014. I think there is a very positive trend in t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00085.html (12,359 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC-2014 Selection Areas (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:01:17 -0200
Hmm. Minimalist? Please take a look the setups in WRTC 2006, 2010. Regards. Martin, LU5DX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00090.html (8,823 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] [wrtc2014] WRTC-2014 Selection Areas (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:25:59 -0200
Hi Dan. I really don't want to generate controversy at this time, considering things are the way they are and it certainly is not going to change. But anyways, and hopefully it may keep improving for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00092.html (20,129 bytes)

69. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: WRTC-2014 Selection Areas (JA participation declining?) (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:18:42 -0200
Is JA participation declining? I do have that impression too, but numbers indicate otherwise. Feel free to take a look at this screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/o66YO5e.jpg Vy 73. Martin, LU5DX ________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00098.html (10,911 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Query on KP1H (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:12:17 -0200
It was not KB1H. It was LP1H. Dick won't modify his log of course, but at least he now knows it was not KP1H. Martin, LU5DX Op at LP1H - 2013 CQ WW DX SSB - MULTI MULTI ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00201.html (12,163 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] Running ID (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:45:41 -0200
I totally agree with you Bob. Last year during CQ WW DX CW, even though I was assisted, I had to wait up to three minutes on an guy in zone 33 to send his call and confirm who I contacted. For other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00013.html (9,074 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Running ID (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:57:46 -0200
You are so right Marteen. Telling people:"...if you don't know who he is, just move on and don't call him...", is like saying: "...if you are not using dx alerting assistance, then you are a second c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00040.html (16,846 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] Running ID *** Maybe the wrong question is being asked... (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 22:54:30 -0200
Well. That's one of the big packet abuses by Lids. If you don't know who he is, you should never call. Plain SOs don't call because they don't have a clue. SO assited have a hint, but they don't know
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00048.html (13,715 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Propagation and log analysis in preparation for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:16:18 -0200
VOACAP on Line es a really great tool. I've been validating predictions using RBN raw data and now ViewProp and it is really amazing to see how accurate VOACAP on-line is. This is what I usually put
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00136.html (12,746 bytes)

75. [CQ-Contest] Station in XE for ARRL 10? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:30:21 -0200
Hello. I'll be in XE from Dec 9th through Dec 16th with a chance to be available for the ARRL 10 M contest. I'd like to meet with locals, and eventually enter the contest part or full time. Please fe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00141.html (7,291 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:53:19 -0200
Super weird things happened. Compulsive calling is spreading like a decease! But not only that. There is now bullying calling. In the middle of an unruly pile up some DK5 called in. I copied his full
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00285.html (11,913 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:01:57 -0200
Hi Larry. Yes, tail-end calling is widely accepted if it's done correctly. But just a few know when to fire their calls effectively using this technique. I believe Tom N4KG is the best tail-end calle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00321.html (16,505 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO (A) in ARRL 10/160 (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:22:00 -0200
This past CQ WW DX CW I've entered SOAB insted SOAB(A) which I've been doing since 2003. I had a blast. I must recognize it is by far more challenging, every mult seems a lot more rewarding and I nee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00340.html (14,096 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Towards a critical examination of the 2-point rule in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:37:34 -0200
"...P.S. Up here in the barren lands of the EU Aurora Belt, we should get 4 points for all DX QSOs that we manage to squeeze through. I'm sure that our fate-sharing friends in Alaska and Nunavut will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00392.html (17,694 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Classic - Doing what was intended? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 23:11:39 -0200
48-hour contesting is indeed healthy. It forces you to train your body as hell if you plan to succeed. You gotta eat right. You cannot drink alcohol (some times hard to achieve, but well...) Being co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00419.html (10,237 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu