Regarding the possible WRTC finish. So far, it looks like it's going to be a photo finnish! I think anything's possible for the current top three teams. Ham Radio News WRTC 2010. The first twelve hou
Too bad to see these activities being conducted during the contest. It will take all the credit away of whatever possition R36F achieves in the contest. Makes the only trusty competition we have so s
Howdy Hans. That's correct. 21 more spots respect to the second most spotted station. That's 21%. And that 21 % was produced only by Willy UA9BA and Igor UA9CDC. No wonder, since Willy publicly indic
Hi Al! Wow! Nice to hear that then, since that means no impact on the top ten at least. Thx for the info!! Regards to yo all. Martin, LU5DX www.5bits.net/lu5dx Hi Martin, Thank you very much for Grea
Sure thing Bob! I'll do that. Thanks so much for putting this together in ms excel format! Vy 73. Martin, LU5DX www.5bits.net/lu5dx For those interested in "slicing and dicing" the statistics from Ma
Howdy. I really enjoyed this WRTC very much. In my case just listening to the action. The amount of effort the organizing committee, volunteers and all people around WRTC 2010 put to make the playing
Howdy guys. The full list of teams and their R3 callsigns and the WRTC results is available at: http://ru.wrtc2010.ru/index.php?id=51&idp=46 The cheerleading or over-spotting of certain stations gene
Thank you so much for your note Doug. People saying there was no impact, may keep saying that as long as they want. Using all kind of arguments, telling I DID NOT participate, whatever they want to s
Hello Don. I believe no one is even questioning the way logs were adjudicated at all. At least that was not, nor is, nor will be my intention. Those of us who have had the chance to participate in WR
Howdy. I've added a who spotted who and a who spotted who by hour tags for the top five teams. You can take a look at it at http://www.5bits.net/lu5dx then go to the 2010 WRTC spots analysis in the m
Howdy guys.. Impossible to know what could have being under the scenario Paul suggested. But well, the spots analysis I made is indeed very selective. It's restricted to spots made of WRTC stations.
Howdy. We posted a signal strength analysis of WRTC teams. Data was retrieved from the Reverse Beacon Network. You can see it at www.5bits.net/lu5dx Once again, congrats to the organizers!!!!! Martin
Howdy Jim! I really understand your position. Not only because it comes from the person that means to me what KH6IJ meant to you, but also because of your personal experience from the DX end of the p
Totally possible. A subtone in your F1 (CQ memory) , some added logic to the soft used for CW skimmer.... CW Skimmer would become AnyMode Skimmer. Martin, LU5DX www.5bits.net/lu5dx [CQ-Contest] Onlin
I don't see any chances for SFI to increase for the weekend. There are active zones in the sun rotating into view but they are not going to face to earth for the weekend :-( 73 Martin, LU5DX at LP1H
Fyi. Season's greetings de Lu5dx By Category CategoryCount of Callsign CHECKLOG 205 MULTI-OP 297 SINGLE-OP5363 (blank) Grand Total5865 By Power Power LevelCount of Callsign 100 1 HIGH 2466 LOW 2850 Q
We talked about past and future WRTC events during our stay at CW5W last weekend (ARRL CW test) and something interesting was said about WRTC operation models (past and future). Knowing in advance th
Hi guys. Remote contesting. The 500 m diameter rule.... I don't see the correlation. What do the op has to do with the antennas being hooked up to the transmiter(s) and located within an imaginary 50
Ron. There are rules for all competitors. Whether you want to be in that "elite" or not is a personal choice. The reason why for specific rules applicable to top entrants in this contest makes perfec
Steve! Amazing great point! I don't know why, but many are responding about this in private emails. However, as I've been pushing for the elimination of the SO/SO(A) separation for the past 10 years.