Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mail@fkurz.net: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] RESULTS CQWW SSB 2004 (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:59:19 +0200
http://ly4a.kli.lt/rezultatai/top%20cq%20ww%20ssb%202004.jpg 73, -- Fabian Kurz, DJ1YFK * Dresden, Germany * http://fkurz.net/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00369.html (7,547 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RESULTS CQWW SSB 2004 (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:59:19 +0200
http://ly4a.kli.lt/rezultatai/top%20cq%20ww%20ssb%202004.jpg 73, -- Fabian Kurz, DJ1YFK * Dresden, Germany * http://fkurz.net/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00958.html (7,547 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 23:23:43 +0100
I can't tell about this particular spot, but such things commonly happen. The whole cluster network is not to be trusted. As an example, I noticed that DX spots made via the IRC interface of OH2AQ sh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00140.html (9,136 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:33:27 +0200
It's the same temptation to cheat with DX-Cluster, excessive power, etc. I don't see the difference. There will always be some scum in the contesting community that cheats. No matter what we do, ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00261.html (8,043 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters supporting LoTW (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 22:52:48 +0200
They'd just have to let you download a version of the lotwreport.adi file that is signed with an ARRL private key and verifiable with an ARRL public key. *Anyone* could, with minimal software require
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00420.html (8,455 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2010] RRTC-2008 scores (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:17:58 +0200
20m signals from RRTC stations were pretty loud here. 15m only open for the first two hours, in which I worked a few R33s there. Later I was often asked for QSY to 15m (and even 10m) -- always tried
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00139.html (7,921 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:30:30 +0200
http://ol5q.nagano.cz/audio.php 73, -- Fabian Kurz, DJ1YFK * Dresden, Germany * http://fkurz.net/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00184.html (7,536 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Does anyone prefer virtual contests to real ones? (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:36:10 +0200
Hi Barry, I feel compelled to answer here since I have probably spend more time practicing RufzXP, MorseRunner in HST mode and CW Freak lately than [anyone else and than] I spent on the radio; and ev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00148.html (10,534 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Errors (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:16:09 +0100
Spotting errors and such things can get even worse: My callsign (DJ1YFK) is obviously about as bad as it gets for CW contesting. There are only very few DJ-callsigns with three-letter-suffixes and to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00056.html (9,666 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Does anyone archive old SCP files? (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:02:29 +0200
archive.org has several old versions of the SCP files from 2004, but probably not all of them: http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.k5zd.com/scp/index.html 73, -- Fabian Kurz, DJ1YFK * Munich, Germany *
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00354.html (7,649 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WAEDC CW: only for Extra class USA (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:03:50 +0200
As others have noticed, indeed common sense would dictate to simply stick to the IARU bandplan and change the wording of the rules accordingly. Make it a recommendation not a restriction. 7000kHz-702
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00268.html (9,785 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW contest analysis database (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:46:30 +0100
Only for CQWW CW 2008, which could easily be downloaded from CQWW.com. The database file advertised earlier here on this reflector was in some cancerous proprietery format that I could not open. I ju
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00316.html (10,218 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Origin of Cabrillo (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 23:07:46 +0100
That's a DQ in the Google Contest, OM. 1st QSO with Google: http://www.google.com/search?q=cabrillo N5KO. 2nd QSO with Google: http://www.google.com/search?q=n5ko+aptos+cabrillo 4th link: .-[ http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00086.html (8,914 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:04:46 +0100
This has a log tradition. LZ3ND spots some juicy DX (usually known calls with one letter wrong) on his own frequency and hopes for people to click on the spot and work him. While this is intolerable
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00345.html (8,121 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Complete CQWW CW 2009 results (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:24:14 +0100
http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/cq_contests/cq_ww_dx_contest/cq_ww_dx_cw_contest/2009_cq_ww_dx_cw_contest/2009_cq_ww_dx_cw_contest.pdf or shorter: http://tinyurl.com/2dhnfoo 73 -- Fabian Kurz, DJ1YFK
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00272.html (8,320 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is the Cluster losing its Luster (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:10:17 +0100
My experience is that the RBN is _significantly_ more useful than the DX cluster, simply because everyone is spotted and the network of Skimmers is now dense enough to give a very accurate picture of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00430.html (8,261 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Unauthorized Posts on DX Cluster are NOT KY1V (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:52:34 +0200
The only way that's not bound to fail would need to be backwards compatible. There are too many open nodes in the cluster networks and it is not realistic that all of them will ever agree on a standa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00211.html (12,398 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] RRTC-2011 tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:19:10 +0200
Hi Luke, didn't get a confirmation either, but a list of the received logs was posted on the contestru reflector (see below). Also the results are available: http://www.srr.ru/CONTEST/ozchr_2011_prot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00176.html (12,073 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu