Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:marcelo@alternex.com.br: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 2002 ARRL DX CW Results (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br (Marcelo)
Date: Fri Sep 27 01:51:24 2002
Hello, I´ve been told that the CW results should be released now for non members at http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/2002/DX-CW.pdf This link is not working for me. Does anyone manage to ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00241.html (12,089 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] 2002 ARRL DX CW Results - TNX (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br (Marcelo )
Date: Fri Sep 27 11:22:25 2002
Hi The link is working today. Thanks for all who replied. 73's to all Marcelo, PY1KN
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00243.html (7,117 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Receiver tests (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br (marcelo@alternex.com.br)
Date: Fri Mar 21 10:43:24 2003
This interesting discussion about receiver tests brings to a question I always had, maybe someone could share his thoughts/experiences about it: There are in the market some high end DSP shortwave re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00245.html (7,091 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Checklist! (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br (Marcelo)
Date: Wed May 30 19:44:13 2001
f4ULgxW16417 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C Good point! Marcelo, PY1KN -- CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00321.html (7,513 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] France (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br (Marcelo)
Date: Wed Jun 6 20:23:56 2001
f56MMvW32173 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C CQ France! I´ll be in Paris next w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00035.html (6,632 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of di-di-dah-dah-di-dit in CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:06:57 -0300 (BRT)
Sure I identify often, usually every other QSO, and often when I am running a pile-up someone just tunes in and keeps sending "?" while I try to copy the calling signals under it. Good operators usua
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00166.html (10,377 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] CQ VP8 (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:16:30 -0200 (BRST)
Hi All I will be on the Falklands on Dec 15 and would like to get in touch with local hams. Does anyone have the email for VP8LP or any other locals? Thanks Marcelo, PY1KN ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00443.html (6,464 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Percentage (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:34:52 -0300 (BRT)
Hi Lee Interesting question. Mine is 21,6%, my log spans back to '89 so the percentage for more recent contacts might be higher. Marcelo, PY1KN and station confirmed on LOTW.  > Mine is running about
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00418.html (8,078 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] C6APR Plane crash link has been fixed (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:56:13 -0200 (BRST)
Friends, Still apalled by the tragic events, I´ve been watching the growth of the  list of comments at the Summerville local paper site. It is really moving to see so many spontaneous homages from al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00231.html (7,871 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5VT SK (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:06:36 -0300 (BRT)
Truly sad news. I didn't know him personally, but regarded him as one of the best. I remember that, in my early DX days, whenever I learned that K5VT was going somewhere, I would be able to work him
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00373.html (8,150 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] AO8HQ vs DA0HQ - ARRL did the worse in two decisions (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 01:32:04 -0300 (BRT)
My 2 cents, It's the IARU contest (not CQ, ARRL, DARC, etc), therefore  the existence of HQ category is meaningful and important. If HQ participation has degenerated in the past years, it's time to f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00184.html (10,822 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] radio-sport.net web site or copy and paste journalism (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:24:24 -0300 (BRT)
Bad press. The contest version of "News of the World", written by a non contester. Like many, I was once hurt by some twisted information there. That tabloid deserves no credit or even comments. Marc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00169.html (10,252 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:56:23 -0300 (BRT)
Bob, Pete et Al I am myself a remote operator. I don't have any problem with that, it keeps me active in the hobby I love.  My station is about 150 km from my apartment in Rio. I think the reason for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00120.html (14,075 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:47:37 -0300 (BRT)
Randy, K5ZD said: "I think it is pretty amazing that someone was able to make 4000+ QSOs from aremote station!  I would rather have that activity on the band than the guynot making any QSOs at all."A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00148.html (10,859 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:17:48 -0300 (BRT)
Hi Everyone     reading, there seems to be some confusion about the concept of remote operation. I hope it is due to lack of familiarity, but I suspect people are confusing it on purpose in order to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00187.html (12,158 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu