Mail Archive Search: <+from:margoh@compuserve.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:margoh@compuserve.com: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Portable Generators (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Tue Jan 13 12:39:02 1998; Greetings All; I have had experience with two Onan generators, and have been very impressed. 1: 4.5KW purchased used in a '73 motorhome, which I had rebuilt about '88. it has received very little mai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00252.html (9,657 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Contest Exchange (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Sat Jan 24 18:38:38 1998; Greetings, All: In the CQ 160M contest this weekend there is a Carribean station which is giving 599 BK as his exchange. The required exchange is supposed to be signal report, state/province/dxcc cou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00518.html (7,195 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Whose contest is this anyways? (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Sun Feb 1 18:48:50 1998; Hello All: Along this thread, some time back I sent a suggestion to the Contest Advisory Committee that there be a "standard" classification which would be 100 watts and a single tower limited to 50; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00003.html (7,053 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Contest IDing (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Thu Jul 23 21:16:44 1998; I personally find it infuriating when a running station does not send the call of the S+Per he is working , just "59xx QRZ...59xx QRZ...59xxQRZ...etc." He may have my call in his log or someone one o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00193.html (6,978 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Sat Jul 25 10:27:35 1998; <snip> One thing I have noticed that really seems to get me a few more contacts during the last few hours of a contest is to become as inefficient as I can - I slow the keyer down to 15 or 16 WPM, se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00213.html (8,809 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Contest IDing (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Sat Jul 25 11:01:04 1998; <snip> I don't understand how a running station can not use the call of the calling station in the response to his call. he: CQ Test xx9xxx test me: kg5u he: 599 111 me: (Here, I'm not going to say a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00217.html (7,451 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Innovative Idea (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Sun Aug 2 13:36:24 1998; Been watching the thread on scoring, both for the CQ WW recently, and further back, for the CQ WPX. The central issue of the debate seems to be fairness, as it gets skewed by the accidents of politic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00020.html (9,020 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Mon Aug 3 09:20:09 1998; In reference to Mario, S56A, idea about using US Call Areas, since the applicability of Call Areas here is only a fond nostalgic memory, the idea does not seem practical, unless the call area is part; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00037.html (7,972 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] What Yuri said (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Wed Aug 5 09:31:45 1998; IMHO, what Yuri said is right on. If its a DX test, then DX counting 3 times as much as "local" contacts will of itself create the motivation to concentrate on DX, without discouraging the "locals" w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00092.html (6,873 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] NAQP Power (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Fri Aug 7 00:08:23 1998; Sorry to disagree with Dr. Bafoofnik, but I do not think an operator's reputation is hurt if he uses an amp internal to his radio or external to reach legal power for a contest, so long as he abides; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00125.html (7,299 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] 0-point qso's (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Tue Nov 17 00:21:53 1998; Most of the discussion seems to have been from the viewpoint of the CQer. 0-pointer for me, I am going to keep right on S-ing without P-ing, cuz I don't care to waste my time adding another 0-pointer; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00235.html (7,301 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] W/K point count (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (RUSSELL C. HILL); Date: Tue Apr 8 11:53:41 1997; As the holder of a "rare" K5 prefix, I observed the following behavior in myself in the immediate past WPX Test: When in S&P mode, I ignored stations having prefixes I had already worked. I am sure t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00185.html (8,096 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] M/S (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Wed Nov 12 09:16:58 1997; I have not participated in a Multi operation, so my comments are from an inexperienced, and therefore unbiased, observer. Intuitively, IMHO it seems as though Multi/Single should mean Multiple operat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00315.html (8,498 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Tribanders (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Mon Nov 17 23:29:11 1997; Hi, Folks, I need some advice: I am primarily interested in single band contesting, 10 or 15m, depending on sunspots, and have been contemplating a tribander at 90 or 100', with perhaps a 10m 5 or 6; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00373.html (7,163 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] CBers on 10M (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Thu Nov 20 10:35:50 1997; I'LL bet not many of the CBers know Morris Code-- The 10M Test does have a CW only entry, and I think a cw entry who spent a lot of time in the suggested freqs in the Novice subband could have a grea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00442.html (6,537 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] CW contesting (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Tue Nov 25 21:15:43 1997; Hi gang; I need advice about cw contesting. I have always participated in SSB only, and would like to get my feet wet in CW. I have done my best to copy the machine sent 35-40wpm code, but am totally; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00522.html (7,524 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] tribanders (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Tue Nov 25 21:15:40 1997; I want to thank N6BV, NT5C, WX0B, WG9L, W3AB, W6XR/2, W3CF, and N5NJ for their useful responses to my query 11/18 about stacking tri and monobanders, and ideas about the TH7DX, KT34, and Force 12 ant; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00523.html (6,965 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] CW Contesting (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Wed Nov 26 21:53:21 1997; Hi Gang; Many thanks to all who answered my request for advice. The consensus seemed to be don't bother with a code reader, but train the reader between my ears. I also received encouragement in aski; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00541.html (6,708 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] Drake Filter (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Tue Dec 2 17:56:18 1997; I have a Drake Low Pass filter for which I need parts Help. It is a TV-3300-LP filter, and one of the "mica wafer" capacitors was toasted when I tried to tune out a pretty high mismatch on 160M with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00037.html (6,976 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] 10M Test Experience (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Mon Dec 15 13:49:51 1997; This was my first serious contest effort since '87, as K5UCV, and I had a ball. I want to first thank all who answered my questions re tribanders( I put up a monobander-below), CW readers(I used the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00304.html (8,315 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]