Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:matt@nq6n.com: 88 ]

Total 88 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 16:48:21 -0500
It would seem that if CQ wishes to take a political stance on the Russian occupation of Crimea, the appropriate thing to do would be to not accept logs from any Russian stations whatsoever. Penalizin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00135.html (14,563 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Reconsiders Policy on Crimea in CQ Contests (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:02:32 -0500
Yes, I was very pleased to see that the decision was reconsidered based on the thoughtful discussion over the past few days. 73, Matt NQ6N _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00223.html (11,089 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:02:34 -0600
I too have a soft spot in my heart for cut numbers. I rarely use them other than 5nn, however once I used them in a cwops mini test to send my member number, which is 1013, or ATAV. It elicited lots
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00265.html (10,270 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB TX IMD (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:31:05 -0600
I found this link for those who (like me) hadn't heard about this: https://sdrzone.com/index.php?option=com_easyblog&view=entry&id=34&Itemid=488 73, Matt NQ6N ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00102.html (8,369 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Boom for Bose Headset (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:56:00 -0600
I've received many unsolicited reports of great audio when using the CM-500 and Jim's recommended EQ settings for the K3. 73, Matt NQ6N _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00005.html (8,541 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] R5GA WebSite Down (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:01:26 -0500
Does anyone know r5ga, perhaps a few donations would help defer hosting costs... 73, Matt NQ6N _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00124.html (7,899 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:16:18 -0600
I propose something like the following approach to calculating QSO points: 1) One point for every grid square traversed by the signal (the shortest path between the two stations). 2) Add a point for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00174.html (9,997 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:30:16 -0600
Just to clarify, my suggestion was not intended to be a recommendation for changing the rules of any existing contest. The scores, score records, and strategies are fun and relatively stable and chan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00190.html (17,009 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:32:16 -0600
I agree. It's extremely impressive. Was there a rule change that allowed this to happen this year, or did N6MJ and Ct1BOH come up with the idea? Can't wait to see if my brain can do it using a simula
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00024.html (8,781 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1 (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:46:12 -0600
"Please copy" is a non-optimal way to exchange information over a radio channel b/c it takes time to say and doesn't significantly improve the chances that the station at the other end will successfu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00407.html (20,768 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1 (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:53:17 -0600
Very interesting, Hans! 73, Matt NQ6N _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00412.html (24,638 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time for a new cq-contest forum format? (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 12:58:45 -0600
While I'm happy with the status quo I'll mention several alternatives: - Google Groups. Works exactly like an email reflector but allows users to optionally use a web interface for posting, reading,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00483.html (12,564 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Easter Egg from the RBN - Not April Fool's, I Promise (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 18:59:06 -0500
This is excellent -- I made a small utility that does something similar and displays it on a simulated pan adapter. It is real time but may require a few CQs before it finds enough new spots to popul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00023.html (9,735 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest simulation using RBN archives (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:36:48 -0500
I've been wanting to build something like this. I'd been thinking of a simulator that utilized VOCAP data to convolve a sine wave so that it sounded like it had been transmitted from some distant (vi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00129.html (10,995 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] modest proposal ...up to 200w (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:33:27 -0500
With the likely FCC rule change permitting higher gain for amateur amplifiers and modern high power MOSFETs, I'd actually expect to see more new HF transceivers manufactured with only 15-35W output c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00239.html (10,774 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] 12-Hour Vintage CW SS? (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:19:42 +0000
Maybe the check could be the vintage of the rig in use. Sounds like fun. Matt NQ6N _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00186.html (9,319 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real Time Scoring and Quick Submissions (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:06:16 -0600
Great points. To Ed's point, maybe there could be a line in the Cabrillo header for a digital signature of the log which would allow LOTW to immediately authenticate it and add the QSOs. I think Ward
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00231.html (12,752 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Video of ZF2MJ from WW CW doing 2BSIQ (Dual CQ) (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:22:50 -0600
This is inspiring to watch and has inspired me to register a copy of DXLog so I can play around with it using the simulator. Dan, I'm curious what settings you found most helpful to use when training
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00044.html (9,672 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thing that drive me nuts (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 12:47:18 -0600
I do this sometimes in an attempt to generate more RBN spots, since RBN considers TEST equivalent to a CQ. It adds enough information to the end of a CQ to allow me to be spotted even if the skimmer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00049.html (9,727 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] signing TEST at the end...not so bad (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:23:38 +0000
I haven't had a problem with dupes or bad spots resulting from sending TEST at the end. It probably depends on how many callers are zero beat, etc. I don't think it would help with broadband skimmers
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00094.html (12,181 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu