Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:matt@nq6n.com: 88 ]

Total 88 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] Youth / Newer hams in contesting (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:17:42 -0500
As a 41 year old I feel obliged to chime in: Before experiencing it, I'm not sure if I would have found the idea of contesting interesting if someone had described it to me. But after becoming licens
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00305.html (15,186 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX High QSO Rate Records (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:51:18 -0500
I think that it's great to acknowledge excellence in all aspects of contesting. Some additional rate leader boards that I would love to see would be: - Best 10 min rate - Best 60min S&P rate - Most c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00115.html (9,859 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest dashboards (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 12:32:14 -0500
I'd be curious about this too. I think I was the one (or one of several) who mentioned the kind of dashboard Ken describes. I've been part of a few very exciting close finishes in the weekly CWT and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00159.html (12,132 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 18:12:17 -0500
It's always interesting to discuss fairness in contesting. I have a few observations: - In a perfect contest, participants would be indifferent to where in the world they operated from. So far we hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00108.html (28,290 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:03:38 -0500
Bob, I enjoyed reading your comments. I certainly hope you are correct. I think the strong participation from all areas of the US suggests that the existing rules are fair enough to create a sport in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00115.html (37,147 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:02:13 -0600
I've had a lot of fun using the online scoreboard during weekly CWT tests. One memorable week I did unusually well out of the gate on 20m (which is rare from W9 with a low dipole) and got to see my c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00147.html (15,847 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 13:33:53 -0600
I operate a bit of FT8 and find the theory of how it works fascinating. It gives us yet another dimension to play with. FT8 can help new contesters with nearly all aspects of contest skill. A station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00034.html (10,831 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 20:13:21 -0500
What's the difference between using N1MM+ Logger with needed mults turned red along with GRITTY with Bayesian decoding vs something like FT4? It seems to me that the main difference is the time sync
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00009.html (13,617 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 88
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu