Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mike@mallardcove.com: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] MARAC SSB Counties Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 06:46:04 -0600
WV2B is no longer handling the logs for this contest. There have also been a few rule changes. Check out http://www.marac.org/ssbrules.htm for more information. Logs should be submitted to: maracssbc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00144.html (7,015 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and Not as PartofMaryland. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:56:45 -0600
The rule clearly states that DC is counted as MD. It is great that you want to be a multiplier as being in a rare multiplier is a lot of fun. Contesting in Montana is much more exciting than Colorado
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00153.html (12,781 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and NotasPartofMaryland. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:26:26 -0600
ARRL has done it in SS. Does that mean that I was in favor of such a move? Just because X entity adds the mult does not make incumbent upon every other organization to do so. --Original Message-- Fro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00172.html (10,302 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and NotasPartofMaryland. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:36:41 -0600
There is no guarantee of anything. Maybe someone will get on and maybe not. It is great that a small number of people want their own multiplier. There are plenty of contests where they are. If people
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00174.html (12,259 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] tech challenge - SAY WHAT? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:01:47 -0600
Rick, I think this is the Old Guard vs. the New Guard. I don't know what it is but people seem to get stuck in their ways the more time goes on. Thankfully, forward thinkers do prevail or else we wou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00288.html (14,520 bytes)

66. [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:37:05 -0600
As a mediocre cw guy I have to say that cut numbers threw me almost every time. I get in number rhythms and ..-- followed by ._ _. _ just killed me. The letter O for zero threw me too. I am sure thos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00294.html (7,399 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] tech challenge - SAY WHAT? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:59:15 -0600
I would agree that there is value in the information. I think the point of the scoreboard is to make the competition better which some may not want. Logs are guarded or protected better than race car
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00327.html (13,111 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] KT0R SK (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:20:38 -0600
A very sad day. Mike W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00207.html (8,306 bytes)

69. [CQ-Contest] November Sweepstakes Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 09:13:03 -0700
Here is the REQUIRED exchange from the ARRL: * Exchange: The required exchange consists of: 1. 4.1. A consecutive serial number; 2. 4.2. Precedence; 1. 4.2.1. "Q" for Single Op QRP (5 Watts output or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00349.html (7,649 bytes)

70. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW end of contest observations (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:39:26 -0600
I was mobile on my way back to Colorado from Montana and at the end of the contest I noticed a fairly large number of stations working stations well after the closing bell. My watch is synchronized w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00254.html (7,655 bytes)

71. [CQ-Contest] Web hosting (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:56:40 -0700
Thanks for all the input. I went with QTH.COM. Scott was great and got me going very quickly and went above and beyond to help. Mike W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00211.html (6,458 bytes)

72. [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint CW 2/8/09 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:17:55 -0700
CQ magazine had it listed for the 3rd. It appears that Bruce, WA7BNM's calendar is not working right as it is not showing the 2009 calendar year. I think it has the wrong info for this week too. I se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00008.html (6,685 bytes)

73. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX RTTY this weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:04:21 -0700
Just a reminder that packet is allowed in ALL entry classes. http://www.cqwpxrtty.com/ The CQ magazine site is very tough to navigate and has broken links to the rules and did not even list this link
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00196.html (7,474 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] A few open Sprint SSB spots available (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:11:56 -0700
The Grand Mesa Contesters of Colorado has a sprint team going for Sprint SSB. We have a few spots left. We are not super serious. Please email me direct if you would like to be on our team. The team
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00206.html (7,169 bytes)

75. [RTTY] NCJ robot rejecting 2009 RTTY Sprint logs. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:18:30 -0600
Says the deadline was 10-19-2008. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00287.html (7,344 bytes)

76. [CQ-Contest] Rules discussions (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:57:48 -0700
Do we really need them? Absolutely! These discussions while they may not change the rules anytime soon, there could be a great idea or change that would really enhance another contest. If you do not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00236.html (7,022 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] Rookie Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:36:37 -0700
This contest is for new people. If you don't like the rules don't send in a log or operate. Enough with all the negative comments. Could some of you folks be any more set in your ways? Concrete is je
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00154.html (8,117 bytes)

78. [CQ-Contest] 40m Broadcast stations moving back in? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:35:51 -0600
Did I miss a memo on this as I noticed a number broadcast stations back in the 40m band. Mike W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00178.html (6,575 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:43:12 -0600
Or they hear QRP and say hmmm looks like a great frequency to steal ???!!! W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00141.html (8,526 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu