Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mike@n1ta.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big jump in qrz.com lookups after 10m contest (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:50:35 -0500
<in jest>Yes, we should also stop talking about the contest afterwards to our friends. They will talk to their friends, and they will talk to their friends, and pretty soon everyone will know where
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00184.html (9,680 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big jump in qrz.com lookups after 10m contest (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:31:43 -0500
When it is NOT being used to increase your score, it's not wrong or impractical. My comments were meant for someone trying to gain a few points by checking the db before submitting. When done after c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00185.html (9,743 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] North American QSO Party, CW (score: 1)
Author: <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:53:49 -0700
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00078.html (6,735 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] North American QSO Party, CW (score: 1)
Author: <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:50:44 -0700
Hi Steef, It is likely the ops just didn't understand they could work you. I worked quite a few EU; there was even a pretty loud F5 calling CQ NA. I talked to my neighbor after the contest and he did
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00079.html (8,046 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspots (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N1TA" <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:13:56 -0700
Well, we've regressed to the same point as we were a year ago with pretty much nothing indicating a rebound. It was good for a while, but certainly not long enough to be a peak. The peak in ~1970 was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00058.html (8,660 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Can a call be too short? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N1TA" <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:10:41 -0700
I held K1KAA for a time (imagine that suffix without perfect spacing). Actually, it was a decent contest call, only because it had a "ring" to it. In regular DX'ing where nobody recognized the call,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00128.html (9,026 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (yet again) (score: 1)
Author: <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:00:52 -0700
...therefore, you are assisted. You have the advantage of knowing which bands are *open* before you QSY. This is something that the non-assisted competitors would not have. With propagation predictio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00182.html (10,441 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (yet again) (score: 1)
Author: <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 15:15:11 -0700
WWV and beacons = physically tune your radio to the frequency RBN and spots = watch the monitor What's the difference? One is instant, the other takes valuable time. Prop predictor = educated "guess"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00210.html (11,626 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted (score: 1)
Author: <mike@n1ta.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:46:54 -0700
Seems to me that your spot filters are set wrong. Mike N1TA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00245.html (8,911 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu