Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mjc5@psu.edu: 253 ]

Total 253 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stand-up operating position (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:42:19 -0500
I was reading a few months ago about a researcher who did some experiments on low level activity and weight control. Turns out that a constant low level of activity can be a great way to control weig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00201.html (9,648 bytes)

202. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Winning Edge (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:18:45 -0500
Hear hear! I've dealt with many extremely talented people who are for lack of a better word - worthless. Had a few work for me. Talent without drive is no gift - more of a curse. If more people would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00304.html (7,559 bytes)

203. Re: [CQ-Contest] Newbie CW logging questions (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:10:05 -0500
This is a great demonstration of why I simply love serial numbers as an exchange. -73 de Mike N3LI - _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00356.html (8,122 bytes)

204. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:33:59 -0500
Suffice it to say that the young fellow did indeed need feedback. Feedback to the Noobs is a delicate proposition in any endeavor, not just contesting. Whoever does it has to make a quick psych asses
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00440.html (10,688 bytes)

205. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:45:17 -0500
Dunno about what John would do, but if it were my contest, I'd thank David for the find, then I'd send personal email to the new guy explaining exactly what the problem was, and why he was not copace
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00441.html (9,769 bytes)

206. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Plaques - Who should win them? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:32:33 -0500
A couple reasons: Dunno about WPX, but for us, the plaques are automatically selected in the software. the results are tabulated, and the right awardee is sent to the right plaque design. I'd have to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00040.html (9,762 bytes)

207. Re: [CQ-Contest] Awards: no more wood? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:16:21 -0500
At first I was thinking that a chest full of medals might be a little silly, as well as bad for the back of the more successful Ops, but this has me thinking.. How about really nice pins such as can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00078.html (8,294 bytes)

208. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:20:37 -0400
Think of it this way Hank - those folks who think they *have* to stay on 14230 aren't moving to other frequencies and depriving you of places to operate other than 14230. You're winning that one! Gen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00123.html (9,756 bytes)

209. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:28:07 -0400
I'm excited. I've always liked the format of State parties, and they can coax me away from my paperwork. Having rotating sponsorship is a pretty good idea. While there can be some uneveness, it might
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00186.html (10,904 bytes)

210. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Ethics for Multi-Op contest (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:57:42 -0400
Sounds like a little self policing would help more than PR. If I knew someone was jamming me or swearing at me, I'd record them and turn them in. You already have most of the parts. The SSTV'er trans
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00188.html (8,464 bytes)

211. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do all contest participants need to follow the rules? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:55:40 -0400
Let me put on the adjudicator hat here for a minute..... Jim was operating during a contest in which the mode he was operating was not a valid mode to submit a log. So the question is was it acceptab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00310.html (9,155 bytes)

212. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX OffTimes (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:33:12 -0400
If you haven't started operating yet, *your* start of the contest happened when you first started transmitting. Don't look at time off as some sort of "thing". It is just something carved out of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00369.html (11,235 bytes)

213. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:29:47 -0400
The idea of what to have as an exchange has been an issue for a while now. As a person who's first several contest efforts were with serialized exchanges, I was kind of surprised by the 599 automatic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00454.html (8,628 bytes)

214. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:31:17 -0400
IIRC, one of the big reasons that it wasn't adopted was that it didn't do much for the state parties, made the entry a little more complicated - it is much easier to have a typo - and required them t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00460.html (8,704 bytes)

215. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do serial numbers in contests hinder participation? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:37:01 -0400
As a wild guess, I'd say you don't like serial numbers in general? Looking at what is in the logs, PAQSO gets a lot of casual activity. I usually have a dozen or more Ops myself who ask what the exch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00482.html (9,719 bytes)

216. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:13:26 -0400
Make no mistake about it. If the PAQSO were to start today, I would use the MARAC county standard acronyms. Now that made me smile. I regularly get my chops busted for introducing changes and adding
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00486.html (14,116 bytes)

217. [CQ-Contest] 2008 PAQP Results posted (score: 1)
Author: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:51:01 -0500
The results for the 2008 version of the Pennsylvania QSO Party have been posted at http://www.nittany-arc.net/paqso.html Certificates are partway mailed out, plaques are at the engravers, T-shirts an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00538.html (7,344 bytes)

218. [CQ-Contest] 2009 PAQSO Party Announcements (score: 1)
Author: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:00:36 -0500
Hello all, QST In the PAQSO Party spirit of innovation and always wanting to try something new, we're going to be adding some new classes to the 2009 Party. The first new class is the "poor setup cla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00002.html (8,159 bytes)

219. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PaQSO] 2009 PAQSO Party Announcements (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:59:39 -0400
Jim, that is such a good idea, I'm not even going to wait a year - I'll append it onto this year's award groups. In these uncertain propagation times, it will be a great way to get a good signal from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00036.html (9,269 bytes)

220. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:46:29 -0400
Despite all claims, I have to suspect that integrity has always been an issue. Who was it that said, "Don't attribute to malice that which can easily be explained by stupidity"? In the middle of comp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00037.html (9,309 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu