Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n1eu.barry@gmail.com: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] SSB TX IMD (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:59:21 +0000
I wish radio manufacturers would get on board and commit to implementing IMD correction like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIimiVMmhmM Imagine SSB DX contests if all the signals were that cle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00100.html (6,624 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:33:10 -0400
I heartily concur with Pete's suggestion. There should be a spirit of actively encouraging reports and recordings toward cleaning up the bands during contests. My experience is that the majority of o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00119.html (16,903 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] excessive bandwidth limits (was:CQ WW CW 2014 Results) (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 06:46:07 -0400
I applaud the efforts to nail down the exact meaning of "excessive bandwidth" going forward. btw, it's a trivial exercise to create a minute or two video/audio clip of the SDR panadapter as "evidence
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00085.html (10,503 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:22:55 -0500
"There are many very nice things about SDRs, but they have two Achillies' Heels -- 1) dynamic range of their input stage is not great enough for most contesting . . . "#1 can be eliminated for overlo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00138.html (9,678 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Advice Sought for Wireless Headsets & Mics (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 05:28:18 -0500
Does that also apply to noise cancelling headphones in general? Thanks & 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00088.html (7,860 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] Rampant Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW 2016 (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 07:55:50 -0500
Instead of the situation improving over the past 15 years with more awareness, key clicks on the bands during contests have gotten much worse. I've copied excerpts from score postings from W1UE and N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00092.html (9,614 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] contest audio on the Web (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:44:54 +0000
Thanks to the efforts of Vasily K3IT, there's a really slick interface for searching for recordings of your contest qso's at https://qsorder-k3it.rhcloud.com/ Right now, it searches recordings of QSO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00107.html (7,400 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:49:13 +0000
I support this suggestion. I am definitely warming up my panadapter. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00112.html (9,516 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:31:10 -0500
I used a K3s last weekend and used a different radio in CQ WW CW. I spent about the same amount of time running but I definitely experienced more key clicks in this contest. It is very likely that th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00150.html (8,420 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:35:07 -0500
Can we please just stop all this nonsense about making a K3 click? Maybe there was one errant firmware release 6 years ago that was quickly fixed. But the K3 has been about THE cleanest cw transmitte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00186.html (9,328 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:56:25 +0000
The K3 rise time isn't 2.5msec. Here's what N6KR said on the subject to the Field tester group in May 2010. This comment was partly in response to whether rise time would be shortened for the new K3
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00267.html (13,805 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your DX Spots during the ARRL SSB DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:53:18 -0500
Based on my experience this weekend, I've got to question whether more than a handful of assisted European operators even tune the bands, rather than just click on spots. Not sure if assisted America
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00051.html (8,089 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your DX Spots during the ARRL SSB DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:59:28 -0500
Ron, I think your experience is common. And I'll repeat once more: We need an S&P only category in the major dx contests! Give folks a viable option if they choose to avoid all the out-muscling, spla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00056.html (12,034 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your DX Spots during the ARRL SSB DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:30:47 -0500
In a word, you don't. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00075.html (10,127 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your DX Spots during the ARRL SSB DX Contest (W1RJ) (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:27:44 -0500
You didn't specify which mode. Field Day would be a good training ground for ssb/cw running - it's generally a very relaxed event. Alternately, high in the band in any cw contest. Or high in the band
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00083.html (8,304 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Little Pistols running (was something else) (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 05:51:03 -0500
It would be interesting if a major ssb dx contest dared to restrict the percentage/duration of time you could run on 40/20/15M. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00102.html (9,155 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Rate Records (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:06:26 -0400
The selection by year and search by callsign don't seem to be working. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00150.html (9,624 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu