Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n1ik@n1ik.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:08:19 -0400
You are exactly right, Al. I am relatively new to this sport, but when the DX station doesn't repeat my call properly, and calls QRZ, I will stay on frequency and hammer him/her unil I hear my call p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00035.html (13,472 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 08:59:01 -0400
Yeah, that's right. Now that I think about it, I started to do that mostly as I got a little more savvy. It's when I send my correct call, twice, and my exchange, to try to be quick, and the DX stati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00046.html (12,043 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW) (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:29:41 -0400
Hi All, Let me say this about that. Dave is exactly right! Requiring someone to learn CW at ONLY 5WPM to advance through the ranks is essentially the same as not requiring them to learn CW at all. Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00377.html (13,069 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW) (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:29:41 -0400
Hi All, Let me say this about that. Dave is exactly right! Requiring someone to learn CW at ONLY 5WPM to advance through the ranks is essentially the same as not requiring them to learn CW at all. Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00966.html (13,069 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cardiologists who are contesters? (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert, N1IK" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 18:09:37 -0400
Please don't tell my Cardiologist that I contest... Hi, I would like to get in touch with any Cardiologists who are also contesters. Please reply to me off-reflector. Tnx & 73 Bob KQ2M kq2m@earthlink
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00351.html (7,998 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2005 Dayton Forum Wrap Up (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 23:16:32 -0400
I'll chime in with two cents. This was my first Hamvention. When I wandered into several of the contesting-related exhibitor booths, and they asked me what my thing was, and I said I was a contester,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00107.html (11,322 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] RE: [YCCC] ft-1000mp beverage switching? (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert, N1IK" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:35:56 -0500
I believe that's right, David, the RX port is not switched off/out when the rig is transmitting. To protect my radio, especially now that I have an amplifier, I installed a relay to disconnect my K9A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00116.html (9,437 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] RE: [YCCC] ft-1000mp beverage switching? (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert, N1IK" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:33:00 -0500
Well, this unit goes between the K9AY control box and the radio, and disconnects the whole thing, preamp and all, from the radio. I'm not sure whether RF coupled to the loop could damage the K9AY box
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00119.html (11,032 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu