Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n1tangoalpha@gmail.com: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: Mike DeChristopher <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:11:18 -0400
Other items you may be interested in, after purchasing the Henry 8k: -5kW dummy load -box of silver amphenol connectors to replace the mickey-moused radio shack connectors in your feed -5kW -rated an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00110.html (9,737 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: Mike DeChristopher <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:53:31 -0500
I noticed this year, more than ever, CW speed seemed to be an issue. Of course, I haven't made a serious SS attempt since my Colorado days, but I digress... W4** CQ at 35wpm. Yes, 35wpm. I called him
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00202.html (15,238 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Mike DeChristopher <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:41:45 -0500
Hi Art, If you email the WPA station, there's nothing he can do to fix it; he can't contact the other station and modify the logs after the contest. That wouldn't be very fair. You can email the log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00338.html (8,341 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:53:34 -0500
Hi Ron, If you email both stations, and the stations use this information to correct their logs, they are making an exchange after the contest - and this is not legal. This is the same as emailing so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00345.html (11,487 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:42:09 -0500
If one were to notify the league and they gave the "blessing", it would fly. But my suspicion is that Sean will say "log it and leave it" lest they create any frightening precedents. But we'll see, t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00353.html (12,555 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CHECKLOGS -- another view CQWW-wise (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:43:54 -0500
Hi Jack (et al), Agreed! And although this isn't an issue specifically related to check logs, I've been wondering about this for at least ten years now. It seems that all it takes to be QRO is the mo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00372.html (10,046 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:18:10 -0500
Hi Doug, Any chance you have historical data on this? Might be interesting to see if there is a trend. Are operators operating less of the contest now than they were, say, ten years ago? Twenty? Just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00379.html (9,488 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CHECKLOGS -- another view CQWW-wise (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:28:09 -0500
There's another point in all of this, and K1AR hit the nail on the head: I'd say with a multi-day backlog at the moment combined with nearly 380 If we are to seriously integrate LOTW into a contest s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00392.html (9,253 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:36:13 -0500
Well, the goal here is not to create a noncompetitive category. It would simply be to give operators a chance to be competitive in a shorter category. So yes, you are correct. The real competitors wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00404.html (11,815 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Calling Disease... (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:50:18 -0500
Pete, I've taken to recording this whenever I hear it (even mid-contest). I don't quite think it's my place to contact these stations and say "listen to this-", but maybe in the future we will have a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00437.html (9,227 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Disease in light of FAIR PLAY (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:06:14 -0500
Hi Doug, I don't think that CQ-Contest is the forum for calling out "unsportsmanlike behavior." Could a forum exist in the future? Maybe, but it would most certainly be abused with petty squabbling.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00495.html (10,720 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Disease in light of FAIR PLAY (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:21:45 -0500
I would hate to have some rookie contester who doesn't know any better find himself on a "lid list" somewhere because in someone else's opinion, he has done wrong. If that happens, I can guarantee he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00539.html (9,475 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE : UP Official Notification (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:27:30 -0500
Anyone who is totally against listening UP has never been on the right side of the pileup. Now, I think it should be used only sparingly, and when the situation calls for it. I also think you should
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00038.html (16,154 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:36:13 -0500
I can't wait to hear EE5E send EEEE. -- Mike DeChristopher, N1TA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00040.html (8,405 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:52:22 -0500
So, is the point of this thread to get organizers to cross check the signal report? If so, this is the only sport on the face of the earth where competitors encourage the governing body to add more r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00085.html (9,588 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:31:47 -0500
Hi Doug... Because the rules tell you to. The rules are available and online. Because the rules tell you to. The rules are available and online. There's a speed limit on my road. A police officer is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00088.html (9,357 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 16:20:25 -0500
Well, I disagree. 100kmph is the "real" rule regardless. The ability to bend it does NOT make it any less of a rule. Being able to follow the rules without constant monitoring is part of being respon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00092.html (10,683 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu