Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n2ic@arrl.net: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:54:28 -0000
slam,) tuning Warming the Neither listening before the start, nor warming up a frequency, was allowed in the 3 WRTC's that I competed in. I think that sets a pretty good example for the contest comm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00337.html (9,631 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:02:05 -0000
This is very different. When you are scoping out traffic nets, you have no idea whether a specific individual will be there, who will be receptive to your contest advances. Loading up a bandmap befo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00338.html (10,747 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:30:00 -0000
An interesting discussion, with lots of divergent opinions.... Questionable practice: 1) Tuning the bands prior to the contest, and loading up your bandmap. You have, in essence, extended the contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00459.html (11,120 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:57:12 -0000
So, we're advocating that there should be no rules that can't be detected or enforced ? Hmmm, we better start with the existing Sweepstakes rules. Let's eliminate separate awards for the A, B, and Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00462.html (12,060 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Anyone notice?? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 01:23:45 +0100
Just in case anyone has been sleeping under a rock the past few days.... College Student Is Charged With Hiding Hazards on Jets By PETER T. KILBORN and GARY GATELY 1,084 words 21 October 2003 The New
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00275.html (14,290 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] Station wanted - CQWW CW - SW USA (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 02:54:37 -0000
With the recent move from CO to NM, I can't quite swing a big trip for CQWW CW this year. Anyone need an operator for single-op, M/S, M/2 or M/M within 6 hours driving time from SW NM - That would ro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00152.html (7,579 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS from KP4 (or WP3) (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 23:23:28 -0000
-- Original Message -- A classic case of selectively editing ! I thought only politicians and talk radio hosts pull this kind of stuff ! If you go back and read my posting at http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00450.html (8,424 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:30:37 -0400
Hey Mal, The N7MAL packet spots are public knowledge: KT8X 28030.0 N7MAL 2231 06 Nov 2004 WK6I 21010.8 N7MAL 2324 06 Nov 2004 W6ZZZ 3562.6 N7MAL az 0350 07 Nov 2004 W6ZZZ 3563.1 N7MAL 0430 07 Nov 200
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00232.html (11,868 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] Live scoreboard during CQWW Phone (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:29:05 -0400
With my 19.2 kb/s dial-up connection, I don't quite have the bandwidth for real-time audio or a webcam, but if you're interested in cheering for a full-time, western USA, SO2R competitor, I will have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00525.html (7,304 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Making the most of 40M SSB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:05:53 -0400
Guy, as someone who has been doing CQWW Phone from the western USA for the past 20 years, I admire your enthusiasm, despite being a little pistol ! 40M SSB is a tough grind from the western USA, even
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00529.html (9,642 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest Live audio (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:12:52 -0400
How is this any different than cheating by using an internet-accessible remote receiver ? 73, Steve London, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00530.html (7,721 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] Questions for JA's about 75 meters (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:37:17 -0400
With the persistent 75 meter jamming originating from the far east, it will be very difficult to work between the USA and JA in the usual JA window from 3792-3803 in CQWW SSB. I know there is another
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00572.html (7,062 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Realtime Scoring for all now with N1MM support (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:16:06 -0500
Anyone have N1MM Logger generating the runningscore.txt file with Windows 98 ? No luck here. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00687.html (10,501 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160 and DX Window (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:25:58 -0500
Funny, I had the same experience on 1823, probably with the same top-scoring IL station. Since I wasn't putting in a serious effort, and he was, I took the attitude "this will hurt you more than it w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00110.html (9,144 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m] (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:26:45 -0500
F-layer from the USA to northern VE2, then auroral-induced sporadic-E from VE2 to Scandanavia. Pretty common with slightly disturbed conditions, as long as the F-layer supports propagation to norther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00252.html (7,447 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m] (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:51:01 -0500
This has only been verified empirically from 24 years of observing this opening from Colorado, and now New Mexico. Here's some recent empirical evidence: - On Sunday afternoon, in the 10 meter contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00264.html (8,745 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:25:14 -0500
Put yourself in the shoes of a contest log-checker. (All calls, contests, and times in this example are completely ficticious.) In checking the logs, you notice that a number of stations claim to hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00272.html (7,124 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:34:44 -0500
I wouldn't say we are at the bottom of the sunspot cycle yet. Sunday's solar flux was 93, SSN 51. The 90 day moving average is around solar flux = 85. A better question would be whether the night ti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00274.html (9,355 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:33:18 -0500
I think you missed a sentence in my original posting. "You [the log checker] have personal knowledge that XY8Z was not active in the contest." _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00278.html (10,405 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:34:34 -0500
Let's test that assertion. For the 2004 CQWW Phone and CQWW CW contests I compared the high-claimed, unassisted scores, as reported to the 3830 reflector, with the final results, published in the Aug
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00324.html (10,923 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu