Sweepstakes is a contest where the "you're" is kind of an intro to the serial number, "You're number 123 Bravo", etc. and actually makes sense - if that really matters. I don't see the big deal. The
I've been looking at the same thing and if I understand it right... It seems the confusion stems from that fact that participating in the WRTC as a non-WRTCer (for, say, the worked all WRTC) and part
N0AX mentioned "54 nearly identical stations" - perhaps either a mistake, or there are 2 spares. 52 is the right number - it's consistent with the list of calls on the site, the team/referee page and
I don't think there's anything for the league to fix. They (always?) list the results (and issue awards?) based on ARRL section. I think the line ARRL-SECTION: <YOURSECTIONHERE> needs to be entered i
I don't think these are final, but there has been some major shuffling of the results on: http://wrtc.jouni.net/cgi-bin/tilanne.pl?hpng=WRTC 1. N5TJ/K1TO (were 3rd) 2. DL2CC/DL6FBL (were 2nd) 3. RA3A
Sounds more like a problem with the scoring process, like perhaps the software that team was using was miscounting (over scoring) something all along, then at the end they realized it and recalculate
In the conversation below, you have already engaged in a somewhat extended dialog (for a contest) - why not finish it and tell him, "This contest is the IARU contest and uses IARU zones which are dif
That page only shows the team mates' calls. Try this http://www.wrtc2002.org/results.htm -Mike N2MG The following me ssage was sent by "Dale L Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org> on Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:39:15 -
I don't think I'd want to be the one to tell a WRTC competitor who has used CT for 10 years that he has to learn TRLog or SuperDuper or whatever. I believe it's pretty much the same reasoning behind
Considering that the OJs ran 100W to a rather low tribander, I have to believe that it was difficult for a "SSB" team to compete. I only dabbled in the contest, but watching the spots and listening t
"Summercamp PileUp contest for fun results (in Excel file)" I think the "for fun" part says it all. ;-) There was a SSB competition as well. -Mike N2MG as
There was a lot of traffic on the reflector in Feb 1996 along these lines. Take a look at the CQ-Contest archives where N5KO's previously quoted post was made originally. http://lists.contesting.com/
I recently ran several searches of the archives on contesting.com. (For those who don't know where to do this, go to the "List Search" in the left menu area of http://www.contesting.com) Unfortunatel
Perhaps that's just what the FCC wants - all hams running 100mW with crappy antennas chatting with their keyboards. No PRB-1, no CC&R issues, no RFI, no exposure concerns... Gee, sounds like the Int
You can get upcoming contest info from several online sources already, so there's really no need (and probably a bad idea) to repost the info here. Some online calendars: http://www.sk3bg.se/contest/
ARRL has been publishing contest results in Members Only for the first month or so, but then moving them to the open section. So non-members have been able to get a free ride (if one were willing to
I was originally against this proposal when I first heard of it as it forces us to process some of our Fall contest logs during probably the busiest contest month of the year, November. As it stands
since contests. I don't think this is what makes a "membership" organization tick. ARRL sponsors the contests precisely TO attract membership. They don't have members so they can sponsor contests. In