They all seem to be marked the same. Not the greatest out of band rejection, and wondered if there were improvements and what they are. Mark n2qt _______________________________________________ CQ-Co
Since the spots output from the skimmer look like the spots from packet (ie callsign and freq) then it seems sensible that the two methods are also equivalent, ie assisted. If it quacks like a duck .
while we're on this topic, does anyone know the difference between the ICE 419, 419A and 419B? Mark n2qt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.
sounds like a winner to me. Mark n2qt (still hoping to EVER win a plaque) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
There are examples of an officially sanctioned contest within a contest. The BARTG rtty contest has a 6 hour variant running along with the 'normal' test. It's good for those with limited time, and i
I happened to be reading the Sept 1955 issue of CQ which gave the rules for the first WAEDC. It was most interesting to see the use of substitutes for countries within the USSR that did not allow ham
4O3A was showing high power filters at Dayton this year (and on the back cover of the current issue of NCJ.) Both Dunestar and InRad have 100 watt class triplexers, reviewed in QST June 2012. Also th
For those of us who click on reports please use the three digit form. It's much easier to click on 001 than on 1. Of course also be sure you include a space at the end of your call so you print as N2