Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4gi@tampabay.rr.com: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:20:30 -0500
Perhaps I'm odd, but if I have only a small amount to participate in a contest, the absolute last thing I would want to do is click around listening to one agonizing packet pileup after another.... T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00310.html (8,702 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:58:31 -0500
I'll sponsor the plaque for this category next year. "Lowest score by a station not competing in a contest who doesn't submit a log" 73, Blake N4GI -- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00449.html (9,704 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wires only? (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:40:36 -0500
If they expect to win something on their first try, perhaps Ms. Packman or Whack-a-mole would be better choices for them than radio contests-? 73, Blake N4GI -- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message cle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00608.html (7,475 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Good Grief people with nothing better to do! (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:58:23 -0500
Just legalize self-spotting. Assistance is assistance, whether you're spotting yourself or someone else does it, I don't care. KA1LMR could let his "friend" do other things during contest weekends, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00140.html (9,018 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] FD observations and suggestion (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:22:47 -0400
Where I am, I think several of the local clubs frown upon "corntester" field day attendance. Some have resorted to doing "secret field day" where the final location is only released to "invitees" on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00334.html (8,989 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:25:49 -0400
I'll say! When the log checkers determine my score, it is always lower for some strange reason ;-) 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00493.html (8,720 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting in the Sunlight [was: SO1R and SO2R] (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:53:43 -0400
The real "differences" already have real categories (ie power, geographic region, # of ops....). The rest are called "excuses" (ie SO2R, time in chair, band limitations, tower only XX feet..). Very e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00561.html (9,676 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] November SS plaque received (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:13:13 -0400
I'll throw a "me too" on the pile of thanks to Icom and ARRL. SE Division LP - my first real piece of wood!!! 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00394.html (10,040 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Extinction (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:24:23 -0400
And the fact that we in the U.S. LOVE deed restricted communities doesn't help... 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00056.html (7,855 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:06:45 -0400
Actually there are lots of great ops on their development/support team.... 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00338.html (7,733 bytes)

51. [CQ-Contest] Contesting Age Trend Analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 19:35:19 -0500
Speaking of articles... I thumbed through the NCJ that was in my mailbox today. Noteworthy that most of the guys in those W2PV photos are the young version of the exact same guys that make up most of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00095.html (8,288 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] SS Packet DANGER, DANGER, Will Robinson!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:52:38 -0500
The whole spotting (or whatever the term should be) mess could be fixed real quick if self spotting were simply legalized for all of the unlimited participants. Why should we limit their kluster usag
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00544.html (12,349 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRM in DX Window (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:00:22 -0500
And I imagine that our groups' proportionally larger ham radio expenditures are also a big help in keeping manufacturers in business and developing fancy new stuff. How many new rigs go on the market
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00704.html (8,501 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes or Duped? (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:25:50 -0500
If I get duped by someone who I clearly recognize as one of my fellow "corntesters" I usually take extra effort to tell them that I have them in my log at XX:XX to give them the opportunity to fix th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00885.html (8,580 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu