Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4ir@charter.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logbook of the World as substitute for bureau QSLing (score: 1)
Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:17:11 -0500
Hi Pete, Since I don't generate the volume of bureau cards you do (1K per year), I can't really say. I have been using LotW since it was available and will continue to do so. However, I will stick to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00261.html (10,738 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Funetics; late addition (score: 1)
Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:13:13 -0500
Maybe last but not least - one year a group of us for Field Day used the call of Forrest, W4JD, now SK. He was a DXer supreme and an Elmer to many of us and sorely missed by all who knew him. Whiskey
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00382.html (6,889 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Easy way to correct answer (score: 1)
Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:05:15 -0500
Rules Interpretation Solution: First, the sponsoring entity will hire the country's best legislation writing lawyers to insure all the rules are written so there can be no room for interpretation, ir
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00484.html (9,748 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of di-di-dah-dah-di-dit in CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:53:54 -0400
When I get the "?" after a CQ, I always reply with a short CQ. 1. He gets my call in a couple of seconds and 2. Some folks use "?" instead of the longer QRL? to inquire if the frequency is on use. Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00159.html (8,096 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS exchange & lazy folks (score: 1)
Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 07:09:58 -0500
Just to be sure these guys "save time" by omitting their call, I come back with "Pse your call again" after a 10 second delay. Dunno if they get the point but it makes me feel better! 73/CUL, Jim, N4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00023.html (7,126 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call (score: 1)
Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:07:07 -0500
David, My first QSO and QSL from Desecho was for KP4AM/D in 1979, 3 days after it became an official DXCC entity. I can assure you that the excitement was such that I did not care what the call was..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00281.html (7,578 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers in SSCW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:32:59 -0500
Chuck, I agree. SS is no place for cut numbers. How much time do you "save" vs. the requests for fills? Then there are the ops who send the call sign in the exchange at 75+ wpm. Whether running or S&
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00210.html (8,348 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] QZB (Suggestion) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:16:03 -0500
Ward, Fantastic workaround! Nobody thought of this before??? Another suggestion (IF you know how to use the split function): 1) VFO A = VFO B 2) SPLIT 3) Use that big round knob to set your transmit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00280.html (8,705 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu