Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n5aw@arrl.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Marv Bloomquist <n5aw@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:00:23 -0500
As another WPX contest is upon us I have to wonder what the rationale is for giving bonus points for 40 meter contacts. WPX originated as an SSB only contest many years ago and perhaps it made sense
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00209.html (7,422 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Marv Bloomquist <n5aw@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:10:05 -0500
Lots of discussion about this topic - as a previous competitor and referee here's my take. Short of reducing it to a computer program there is really no practical way to make the qualifying criteria
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00131.html (8,839 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Observations of a young ham (score: 1)
Author: Marv Bloomquist <n5aw@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:12:16 -0600
While the comparison to online gaming is interesting I think a more accurate comparison would be to athletics which is certainly attractive to many young people. Long hours of practice lead up to a f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00329.html (8,953 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 80 meter delta loop (score: 1)
Author: Marv Bloomquist <n5aw@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:30:24 -0500
Other responders have given good advise on the 80 meter delta loop. I'm fortunate enough to have one with the apex at 210 feet (have access to a 300 foot Emergency Services tower on my property). I'm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00137.html (6,986 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu