simply and calmly or she feels it is time, but maybe it practice is not Well, in theory this may sound good, and it may sound nice to those who are interested in following the instructions of the DX
Perhaps I should have taken broader view of this issue rather than limit it to it's relevance to contests. In the case Bill cites here, a novice operator claims that using the last two is the techniq
Please consider the following as the desired interchange: DX: Victor 26 Bravo (or just V26B) NA: Kilo Echo Nine November Alpha DX: KE9NA 59 8 NA: 59 4 DX: Victor 26 Bravo (or just V26B as appropriate
With this late announcement, I would think those who are not on-line and connected as well as we are will not know about this and begin on the 5th. Maybe there will be two September CW Sprints this y
simply and calmly or she feels it is time, but maybe it practice is not Well, in theory this may sound good, and it may sound nice to those who are interested in following the instructions of the DX
Perhaps I should have taken broader view of this issue rather than limit it to it's relevance to contests. In the case Bill cites here, a novice operator claims that using the last two is the techniq
Please consider the following as the desired interchange: DX: Victor 26 Bravo (or just V26B) NA: Kilo Echo Nine November Alpha DX: KE9NA 59 8 NA: 59 4 DX: Victor 26 Bravo (or just V26B as appropriate
OK, so the changes are that schools will be identifiable, multi-ops will be identifiable, guys who feel they need to use packet will be identifiable, and all those who want to do as they've always do
Jim , et al; There is no need for conversions to be done. *Standard* abbreviations, and "shorthand" that is commonly used should be permissible in the log files. Having a program allow for these shou
I cannot believe the discussion this subject has spawned. Some old timers complain, new guys complain, but the vast, silent majority just copies 599 when they hear 5NN. What's the big deal ? I confes
Lew, Perhaps, as CAC chairman, you know why this is being looked into at all. Aside from the never-ending arguments here on the contest reflector, what's driving this ? I would suggest that more effo
OK, so the changes are that schools will be identifiable, multi-ops will be identifiable, guys who feel they need to use packet will be identifiable, and all those who want to do as they've always do
Jim , et al; There is no need for conversions to be done. *Standard* abbreviations, and "shorthand" that is commonly used should be permissible in the log files. Having a program allow for these shou
I cannot believe the discussion this subject has spawned. Some old timers complain, new guys complain, but the vast, silent majority just copies 599 when they hear 5NN. What's the big deal ? I confes
Lew, Perhaps, as CAC chairman, you know why this is being looked into at all. Aside from the never-ending arguments here on the contest reflector, what's driving this ? I would suggest that more effo
It might not reduce participation, but it'll surely reduce log submissions. Robert E. Naumann N5NJ / V26O Plano, TX USA ex KR2J, V26RN, W6V, WA2OVE -- Original Message -- From: Ken Widelitz <widelitz
I would suggest that you take a good guess what year you were licensed and use that number whatever it is - just to be consistent. It does not matter what year you pick - just send the same thing dur
This raises an interesting point. In my opinion, what you did should not be an option. If you were to do that, because - as you say, you were bored, you should maintain the "A" precedence for consist
Hans, I think you're missing the point - he's going to look for guys on SSB with the intent of getting them on CW. This, while it may not be specifically addressed does, in my opinion, violate the sp