Leave them in your log. Choose CW as your entry classification, and only your CW qsos will be counted for your score. The SSB qsos will be there to confirm those qsos for the log checking process. --
I suppose it all depends on what you're looking to do. If you're looking to have fun and work stateside stations, and some DX if the considitons will allow, then 6 meters in the June contest is for y
Yes. The Cabrillo log processing process supports this type of log handling. -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! h
For clarification (de AA4GA): The question is: If I operate 15m single band, but make a dozen Qs on 10 meters as the result of QSY requests, but only submit a log with 15m QSOs, will the guys I worke
If there is no log to prove that he's "Not In Log", the qsos would stay. The problem arises where there is a log for the station claimed, but the qsos are not confirmed in the log. Therefore, they ar
By allowing for these qsos to be in the same log file, it actually makes it easier for the station submitting the log. Isn't that simpler? I did just this in the 10m contest. I entered as only CW, bu
Jim touched on the point I was going to make regarding being able to get behind the radio equipment to do wiring. In my current shack, I have 18" between the back of the desk and the wall. This allow
Marty, Multi-Single can be a lot of fun, but in CQWW and ARRL, the rules governing how that second station is used are significantly different. In CQWW, the second or 'Mult' station can work multipli
There's a neat free program you can get here: http://users.iafrica.com/d/da/dalen/tclockex.htm This does everything you want and more. Robert E. Naumann N5NJ / V26O N5NJ@arrl.net www.qsl.net/n5nj Pla
Interesting perspective Jim. For multi-single, I think it should be doubled to 12. The reason I say this is that in most cases, a multi-single station will run on one band and change bands to work a
Doug, Perhaps, given your years of experience, or perhaps as a result where you are, the amount of interference on that frequency seemed normal to you and you felt that you had a "clear-enough" frequ
Key to any rule that clarifies this issue is the idea that assistance cannot be pre-arranged, or solicited in any way. If some random operator that you don't know tells you about the 'JT1 just up the
If you've left a frequency, you're not there anymore. Since you're not there, it's not your frequency. Leaving one frequency to make a qso elsewhere is a risky proposition. You have no right to your
Bob, I believe that you're interpretation is correct. The WPX multi-single is now the same as the CQWW multi-single. I'm not sure that this is a good thing in the long run, but it will keep the guys
If enough of us do this, we can kiss the CQ contests good bye in the near future. In my opinion, this view is very short-sighted. Adding this cost to the total amount of money that most of us, who a
For Kenwood repair try http://www.avvid.com Clif Holland KA5IPF runs that business and is honest, and very reasonably priced. I have no affiliation other than as a happy customer. 73, Bob N5NJ take h
Wow! Joe has got a ton of useful data there. It looks like we've got some very slow steady growth even though percentage-wise it's not much. Especially interesting is the listing of people who are tr
Not necessarily! Before this gets out of hand, the only time you would lose a QSO if the other guy makes a mistake is if the mistake is not to log your call or something even slightly similar to your
Bill, I think this is a measurable, consistent way of comparing the operators pileup copying capability. Since it is recorded, the comparison of one operator to another is real. In other words, this
Another example of this that I participated in was from V26B, where I was having a 375+ hour on 15m and K3MM sitting next to me was on 20m and was also having a 375+ hour. Our qsos were alternating o