Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n5nj@gte.net: 154 ]

Total 154 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Virus Attachments from Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 06:46:50 -0500
Hal, This phenomena is becoming more commonplace over the last couple of years with the exploitation of some security weaknesses of Microsoft email programs. These virusses (virii?) masquerade as oth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00072.html (10,340 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW single band entry plus check log. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:20:19 -0500
Work whoever you want on any band and log them in one log file. Make sure your one (1) Cabrillo file that you submit shows your entry category as the correct single band. Your log will be scored base
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00180.html (9,348 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:36:49 -0600
I have to respectfully disagree that this is a foolish topic. Contest ethics, due to the "honor system" that is part of the contest landscape, may instead be the most important topic we could discuss
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00200.html (11,557 bytes)

64. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:37:26 -0600
WN3VAW said: == There is no way to determine if the Packet Cheerleaders have been organizedin advance by the station(s) in question, or if they just decided to do it on their own without the knowledg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00231.html (11,672 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders-enforement (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:20:49 -0600
OK, so let's just throw out all the contest rules, since there are ways to cheat every one of them. Now, seriously: I'm sorry, but I cannot believe that we cannot define proper contest behavior in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00300.html (9,479 bytes)

66. RE: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:59:20 -0600
As much of a stickler as I am for the "spirit of the rules" and contest ethics, I must agree with Ken on this. In 31 years of contesting, warming up on the air *before* a contest starts has never bee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00373.html (12,149 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] Rules, debates, and other annual occurances (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 07:28:08 -0600
The recent recurring debates seem to be focused on a couple of key points of contention. 1) Some feel that you can't have a rule that can't be enforced 2) Some feel that packet should not be restrict
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00487.html (10,502 bytes)

68. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:24:06 -0600
AK0A: Who have you heard do this? Until we get some facts, there is no value in such claims. de N5NJ == From: "ak0a" <ak0a@kc.rr.com> Date: 2004/11/29 Mon AM 11:27:43 CST To: "Russell Hill" <rustyhil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00805.html (14,383 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: W4AN SO2R Switchbox (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:04:04 -0600
A nice presentation by K2UA is also available on contesting.com here: Hi All, I've had so many requests for info about the late-W4AN's SO2R switching that perhaps it's better to post to the list. Via
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00047.html (8,151 bytes)

70. Re: RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:25:18 -0600
While we all hate the fact that the line scores are out of QST, and we all know that the biggest spenders in ham radio are contesters, the future ham demographic shows that ARRL members will not be t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00102.html (9,579 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Awesome Morse Trainer (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:01:25 -0600
Peter meant to say Alt-F9 to go down and Alt-F10 to go up in CW speed This would be good - along with allowing the editing of memories. I like to have: F1: CQ TEST N5NJ F2: 5NN ## F3: TU N5NJ F4: N5N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00451.html (10,053 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] CHECK LOGS (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:20:26 -0600
Jorge, You should submit only one Cabrillo log file containing all qsos you have made. Do not submit one file for your single band entry and another as a check log. The entry classification should in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00460.html (8,889 bytes)

73. Re: RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:34:58 -0600
The likelihood that a person who would need to do this would be within one qso of winning anything is highly unlikely. Not worth the trouble to guard against. Back to net. N5NJ Yes unfortunately you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00542.html (10,334 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Wed Jan 29 03:18:06 2003
Modern SO2R ? Was it really SO2R before then? I find myself in the somewhat awkward position of partially agreeing with KQ2M. I don't think Bob was the first to use SO2R, but more on that later. I al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00009.html (12,711 bytes)

75. [CQ-Contest] Going Over to the Dark Side (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Sun Jan 12 16:57:08 2003
Ron, If you weren't bothered enough to copy down their calls, why would you bother to tell the story? Someone could make up a story like yours without ever turning on their radio to just make another
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00107.html (10,579 bytes)

76. [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Sun Jan 26 15:29:48 2003
SO-Assisted (ie Packet) under one name or another -- Nope. This is a popular misconception. SO-Assisted is a multi-op category. Single Operator (not assisted) is the only single operator category, w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00398.html (7,802 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] A fun story from this weekend! ( no politics ) (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Tue Apr 1 06:18:10 2003
Well, for me to have fun involving ham radio is very rare these days, but I did have an experience Sunday that was fun. I was running (more like jogging) stations on 10m at about 28.388 Sunday mornin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00010.html (7,445 bytes)

78. [CQ-Contest] Fw: [ntcc] N8SM Tragedy (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Mon Jun 16 20:07:46 2003
I'm sorry to pass along this sad news about my good friend N8SM. Details to follow. N5NJ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00212.html (7,243 bytes)

79. [CQ-Contest] Fw: [ntcc] N8SM Memorial Service (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Mon Jun 16 20:09:07 2003
fatal me http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmap&ed=pikLyOp_0TpRuL9ER63yXm.PJPJGt54uwUmcDd138UaxDXNMhd3tRad.&csz=Frisco,+TX&country=us
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00213.html (8,408 bytes)

80. [CQ-Contest] N8SM Memorial Operation in IARU (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Fri Jul 11 10:05:42 2003
As many of you already know, we recently lost our good friend, Steve Miller N8SM, in a tragic accident where he apparently fell from about 50' on his tower. There were no witnesses, and Steve was wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00137.html (7,047 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu