Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n5ot@n5ot.com: 212 ]

Total 212 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calender (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:35:45 -0600
Jan 14-15 for CW and Jan 21-22 for SSB. I got these from Bruce. I have suggested to the Powers That Be that perhaps the dates could be made available on a more-like Fiscal Year basis - I plan my con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00477.html (7,533 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competitor Friendly Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:49:15 -0600
Hats off to Kirk for a really good summary of reality. I'm not sure this is as pronounced as it may seem - I counted them up in the 3830 archives and found: Number of Top Ten High Power guest ops*: 1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00517.html (9,968 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to expect from 10 meters??? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:29:55 -0600
Somebody reading this with a 10 meter contest station should invite this guy over. Jacob, where do you live? You wanna come down to Oklahoma and operate? Mark, N5OT _________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00164.html (8,692 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:55:49 -0600
NX5M: N7MAL: Sorry guys, I'm not interested in entering a race against others using crutches only to find out that one or two of them who don't need crutches can go faster than me if they borrow some
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00288.html (8,467 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:46:25 -0600
I appreciate your post, MAL, thanks. My post was pretty much to say that if the sponsors allow unrestricted packet use at all times by all competitors as you propose, I would not be interested in pla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00299.html (11,137 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:39:24 -0600
W2UP: KM3T: Thanks Dave. What you say is right on the mark. W2UP: I don't think it's much of a question any more that a significant number of guys pointing, shooting, then logging, are not capable of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00315.html (10,333 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:05:19 -0600
VO1HE: Gads, Paul, please be careful when lumping me in with N7MAL(!) I must tell you that I certainly never "categorized all cluster users as 'cheaters'" and I don't think MAL did either. Mark, N5OT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00331.html (6,927 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:09:18 -0600
W2UP: Barry, please remind me where I told anybody how to operate. I don't believe I did. Hey guys, that's two misrepresentations of what I said in about a half hour. How about reading before flying
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00332.html (9,769 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:50:06 -0600
This happens to me all the time because people think Larry, K5OT, and I are interchangeable for some reason, eh, Larry? I have never had a person whose "QSO B4" I replied to with "NIL" blow me off.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00446.html (7,278 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:03:45 -0600
I think WRTC tries to draw a line between: 1. On-site contesting between champions 2. What we all do every weekend anyway There are marathons and there are marathons. I don't think I'd give a hoot a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00498.html (8,200 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:38:23 -0600
Is there a form you fill out to get the discount? Where can I get one? Mark, N5OT (dead last on the SOHP Top-Eleven #$%^) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00526.html (8,282 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB - K5NZ and "deja vu all over again" (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:25:40 -0600
Cripes, what got into you, Ebenezer? Points off for insensitive language. Happy Boxing Day. This is the day Scrooge only THOUGHT he was throwing money into the streets and shouting "Merry Christmas"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00574.html (7,552 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Computer RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:39:18 -0600
Various comments about shack RFI and computer monitors: AND AND For some reason, when I switched to flat screens I noticed an improvement too, but lately the RFI grunge is creeping back. I believe th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00604.html (9,604 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] RFI filters (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:56:48 -0600
Hi guys, FYI all my surplus RFI filters are spoken for at this point. Thanks for the quick response. If I see another large lot I'll grab it knowing there is lots of ham interest :) Mark, N5OT ______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00615.html (6,742 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to aN extreme (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:03:01 -0600
Jim Lux: W4EF: Time for the reality police to intervene. I think it is clear from my web site that the incident Jason originally complained about is the way in which we kept some of the younger teena
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00619.html (8,212 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Oops (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:40:27 -0600
Ooops. Wrong reflector. Sorry. Happy new year everybody! Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00002.html (9,226 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Time Calculation (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:59:19 -0600
It's interesting that most of the replies to the posted question: said a lot of stuff about how people think it could and/or should be done. K6LL answered the question the way it IS done. Let's assum
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00056.html (8,825 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] In Conclusion ... (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:06:49 -0600
I hadn't realized that Cabrillo was falling apart. John's right, it's obvious there are no sunspots. About 60% of this traffic is quite silly. Let's see: 1. People trying to give Cabrillo a bad name
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00166.html (9,704 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW "West Coast Battle Cry" (score: 1)
Author: <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:51:25 -0600
Hi Craig - plenty of hot-shots operate at their own stations - that's a very long list and I'd do a disservice to many if I tried to list them all off the top of my head. Even though all those guys a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00260.html (9,363 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Newbie Assimilation (score: 1)
Author: <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:05:42 -0600
Craig, I for one appreciate the time you took to get this written down, OM. I'm not sure what to tell you. Like many things in social life, the contesting echelons are exclusive and cliquish, and th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00272.html (11,322 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu