- 1. [CQ-Contest] WWDIGI TEST (score: 1)
- Author: <n6ar@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:40:14 -0400
- Guys, Worked the WW DIGI Contest this weekend. It was a lot different contest than I envisioned. Hardly any FT8 contest activity except on 80, where for some reason the designated FT4 segment was emp
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-09/msg00016.html (8,363 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] On Line QSL (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Brockman <n6ar@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:46:58 -0800
- Guys, I read with interest all the criticisms of e-Qsl. All the comments about double blind being needed are baloney. Its not the 2 m fm Qsl with an I4 thats a problem, but the false paper Qsls with
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00087.html (7,923 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] On Line QSL (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Brockman <n6ar@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 13:51:32 -0800
- And he could do the same thing with LOTW! Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00089.html (9,474 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 206, Issue 39 (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Brockman <n6ar@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:00:46 -0500
- On the FT4/FT8 protocols. Worked the FT4 DX Contest this weekend and noticed the following. 1. The feature that sends TU; N1XX 599 FL is almost worthless because you have to click on the next call in
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00000.html (8,287 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu