Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n6bk@yahoo.com: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Running ID (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
It appears to me that many of the big rare contest stations are maximizing their rates by never IDing as long as there are enough assisted guys calling who already know who they are. This makes class
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00012.html (7,085 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] The 2 point exception - WTF? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Hi after being off the air for the last 15 years or so I am a noob to the ways of modern ham radio, not to mention serious contesting (computer logging is still a novelty and I was never able to hook
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00270.html (8,130 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] 2pt rule (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:35:40 -0800 (PST)
expeditions for the contests to North American island countries in the  Caribbean.  It did that and their being there made those multipliers available to everyone.  It would be hard to change the ru
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00360.html (7,781 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2pt rule (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Well I guess we all have our own motivations for competing. Say Marty instead of taking away your 2 points for intra-continental Qs, what if say I also got 2 points for working JAs or BYs? Would that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00367.html (11,223 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2pt rule (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 04:07:11 -0800 (PST)
Well if you are referring to the WAE or the AA, those contests are one region vs the rest of the world, and the 2 groups are ranked separately, as would be expected since they compete under different
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00387.html (11,486 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] 2 point rule (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:22:03 -0800 (PST)
Hi and thanks for all the comments.  I am persuaded by the arguments in favor of retaining the 2 point rule for NA. In fact those arguments apply to other continents as well and IMO applying the 2 po
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00417.html (7,080 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2 point rule (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Great post Jack. I think most contesters would like to use the scores as a meaningful indicator of how their efforts and stations, in general and more or less, rank and compare with others in their c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00425.html (11,348 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2 point rule (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:20:34 -0800 (PST)
Hi Hope my previous posts have addressed every point. Well I would really like to hear from them just how giving all stations 2 points for intra-continental Qs would assault their sense of fair play
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00429.html (10,879 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Miles per Q (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 16:29:38 -0800 (PST)
I would love a contest like the W1BB for the HF bands. No continents, no rare zones, no rare countries, no rare states, no rare prefixes just pure DX mano a mano around the globe. No signal report ju
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00496.html (11,275 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wouldn't it make sense to switch the ARRL 160 and 10m contests? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Yeah why not? Everything else is already optimized for the northern latitudes... 73 Bob HS0ZIA Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00230.html (8,837 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why I ignore "NA EU" etc (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Hi Charly I'm not sure what this has to do with contesting but I will say I have been impressed by several zone 8&9 ops who have have held the NA hordes at bay while they listened for Asia at the gra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00148.html (8,684 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:41:11 -0800 (PST)
I vote for death. Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 1/29/2014 2:43 PM, Vladimir Sidarau wrote: _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00163.html (9,921 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:53:34 -0800 (PST)
On Saturday, February 1, 2014 8:36 AM, Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you to K0RC and W9WI for getting it right.  Contesting - and amateur radio generally - exists to make contacts and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00231.html (10,336 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] error report (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 02:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
Hi I just received my logging error report for the CQ SSB. I am not interested in an accuracy sub-competition as recently discussed but would like to know how I am doing relative to the top stations.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00158.html (7,069 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu