Of course they should call high power stations! As much as I mumble and grumble about "those darn QRP stations" when they call me in a contest, forcing me to pull them out of the noise, they represen
On Mon, 14 Jul 1997 15:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> writes: The English language is an interesting thing, is it not? I read the sentence above as: "Should stations in the QRP class c
I read Tree, N7TR's...oops, I mean RICH, N7TR's <g> comments on two radios in SS phone with interest. I too have never used two radios in Phone SS, and I won it one year not too long ago. But I would
Of course they should call high power stations! As much as I mumble and grumble about "those darn QRP stations" when they call me in a contest, forcing me to pull them out of the noise, they represen
On Mon, 14 Jul 1997 15:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> writes: The English language is an interesting thing, is it not? I read the sentence above as: "Should stations in the QRP class c
I note with interest the recent results of the 1997 ARRL DX CW contest. I have heard it said over the years that "if single-op-assisted is a "real" class of entry, how come they never beat the unassi
I note with interest the recent results of the 1997 ARRL DX CW contest. I have heard it said over the years that "if single-op-assisted is a "real" class of entry, how come they never beat the unassi
I note with interest the recent results of the 1997 ARRL DX CW contest. I have heard it said over the years that "if single-op-assisted is a "real" class of entry, how come they never beat the unassi
* sleep occurs naturally in 90 minute blocks; * the most restful times of sleep are just before you would normally get up. I haved tried this strategy and, for me, it works. I plan off time to be jus
Thanks to KR2Q for pointing out the URL for the new rules for CQWW (www.affcom.com/cqcontest/cqwwruls.htm). I looked and noted the following for the 1997 contest: XIII. DEADLINE: SSB logs must be pos
The rules of a 1x1 callsign, cut and pasted verbatim from the ARRL web page: While the 1x1 Call Sign system in not intended for the exclusive ability to have a short call sign during an upcoming amat
This has been an interesting experience. Thus far, I have submitted CQWW phone logs and ARRL SS CW logs electronically, following both sponsor's rules. Here is a summary of what happened: CQWW: * log
Gee, I did that last year as W6AX and N6IG. Boy, did the contest "community", at least as represented on the reflector here, have a fit! I got all sorts of complaints, threats, and comments that peo
That may be well and good, but: 1) The "General Rules" are in the December QST, the 160 Meter contest announcement isn't, it was a couple of months earlier. (I don't have a stack of QSTs here to refe
Benefit to WHOM? Besides this thread is about ARRL contests and ARRL's new rules. The scenario you describe is already done frequently in CQ contests and is just fine per their rules. And what harm w