Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n6tj@sbcglobal.net: 205 ]

Total 205 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [CQ-Contest] A tuff CW copy (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:41:57 -0800
Two of my all-time favorites from the same CQ WW CW in the early 80's: L8D/X and 6E5EBE. Try those at 40wpm late in the contest. It's a good thing these were before analyses of unique callsigns. Jim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00604.html (9,042 bytes)

162. [CQ-Contest] AN OPEN LETTER TO THE CQ CONTEST COMMITTEE (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:06:03 -0700
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE CQ CONTEST COMMITTEERumors are flying once again. Perhaps true; hopefully not. I thought perhaps it useful to dust off my letter from three years ago. Vy 73, Jim Neiger N6TJ Mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00259.html (10,289 bytes)

163. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:59:04 -0700
With all due respect, one might reasonably ask as to why such an asinine survey is even contemplated if someone did not already have a canned a priori result in mind and seeking a one size fits all s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00402.html (10,794 bytes)

164. Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Laws of propagation-Have they been reinvented (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:27:43 -0700
And to confirm while Frank and I've been friends for decades, I've never operated his station, or even been to his house. I maintained my own 9Y4AA station near Port-of-Spain in the early years, and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00174.html (8,533 bytes)

165. [CQ-Contest] SECRETS OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER: I CAN'T REMEMBER (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:27:39 -0700
On this subject, some of us spun it around in the early 1980's, and I guess there were many arguments opposed to ANY "change", one of the often stated: "it will invalidate all the records". Most of w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00125.html (12,655 bytes)

166. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Online Database adds 1969-1970 (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:16:44 -0700
Thanks Randy and N2NC Team for remembering my 45 years ago victories from 9Y4AA on both modes in '69. My "killer station" was comprised of a Collins S-Line, 30L-1 amplifier - never pushing the four 8
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00014.html (9,380 bytes)

167. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:09:56 -0700
Perhaps it could be as I encountered in my four DXpeditions to Canton Island in 1971-72. I operated from Canton Island (now Kirabati - Tango 31, I believe). Canton, (and its larger island group - the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00139.html (23,823 bytes)

168. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying & RDXC (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:41:03 -0800
As I approach my 76th birthday and in my 61st year of ham radio and contesting - I often reflect on what has made my life, and ham radio in general and contesting in particular, meaningful, interesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00168.html (15,616 bytes)

169. [CQ-Contest] WRTC QUALIFICATION (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:38:46 -0800
if I was King of The World for one day, WRTC Qualification would be simple. Any two man team, anywhere, who wishes to compete, simply "contributes" a finite sum (5000 Euros?? Pick a number) to the WR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00483.html (16,998 bytes)

170. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:31:24 -0700
Anyone serious about winning isn't going to waste their time posting their score. Every minute counts I believe that enticing others into contesting is better served by inviting them to a station to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00157.html (9,547 bytes)

171. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:12:05 -0700
Steve, you may be right. You may be wrong. "Straight" or not. I seriously doubt that my DOS computer with TRLOG running has this feature. One thing of which I am certain, it is NEVER connected to the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00169.html (9,991 bytes)

172. Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015 (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 16:34:41 -0700
AMEN. As one of those originally labeled as a dinosaur some twenty-five years ago because my extensive operations as DX had clearly demonstrated, to me - at least - that, at the time PACKET, was grea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00785.html (14,544 bytes)

173. Re: [CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP? (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:33:59 -0700
SCP is no worse than skimmers or packet. Once you've opened those barrels of worms, you've already cheated yourself from skills (1) once learned, twice forgotten; (2) that you were never taught; (3)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00158.html (10,714 bytes)

174. Re: [CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP? (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 12:34:24 -0700
Let me get this straight, Ken: Your country of Trans-Slobavia has no rules on your maximum transmitted power. Ergo, even though CQ WW DX Contest rules say no more than 1500 watts, (1) you're not goin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00009.html (9,097 bytes)

175. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:04:43 -0700
I believe that uniques should count, and have witnessed over the decades - very much depending upon from where I'm operating - the rarer, the more real uniques. QUESTION: SU1AH needed me for a new DX
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00016.html (9,600 bytes)

176. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:47:42 -0800
I thought my idea of some years ago had "merit", but as I appeared to be the only one - it didn't fly too far. In essence: Your two man team plunks down 5000 Euros (too much?? too little??) and you'v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00179.html (9,655 bytes)

177. [CQ-Contest] IT SEEMS TO ME (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:06:39 -0800
It seems to me that the Boys in Madeira (one of my all-time places, ever, to visit - you need to see Funchal, all alit with Christmas lights) simply out-operated, or perhaps had fewer Murphy's that t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00284.html (12,564 bytes)

178. [CQ-Contest] ASSISTED vs UNASSISTED (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:56:11 -0700
Assisted vs Unassisted participation was nicely summarized in the 2015 CQ WW SSB DX Contest results. Unassisted comprised 59% of the Single Operator entrants, and 41% Assisted. Perhaps when those num
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00154.html (6,719 bytes)

179. [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change (score: 1)
Author: Jim Neiger <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 15:17:13 -0700
I was saddened to read Randy K5ZD's article entitled *Convergence and Change*, page 27 of the May 2016 CQ Magazine. Obviously Randy has succumbed to the *dark side* of the force and chooses to operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00077.html (9,255 bytes)

180. [CQ-Contest] CONTESTING FUN (score: 1)
Author: Jim Neiger <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 19:34:14 -0700
Well, since I kind of started the CONVERGENCE AND CHANGE spin here, in response to K5ZD's "editorial" in the recent CQ magazine, I wanted to comment simply on Bill N3RR's final words herein: *more FU
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00216.html (24,652 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu