Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n7mal@citlink.net: 343 ]

Total 343 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:50:24 -0000
Ed you said:""I don't subscribe to CQ mag, so I never know how I do. Has the contest become a marketing ploy for subscriptions?"" Well if that is their plan it's not working very well, at least by me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00020.html (11,203 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 17:13:44 -0000
John you said:""whose reason for existence is to sell magazines"" That was a giant over-simplification. Most likely they don't even break even selling CQ Magazine. They make profit from selling adver
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00067.html (12,562 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 22:21:32 -0000
Whoa Big Fella: Let's slow down and take a deep breath. I posted the remarks about the 3 year wait for the certificate not because I give a 'tinkers-damn' about the certificate it's about the princip
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00151.html (15,266 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:45:41 -0000
This is interesting because I've been emailing privately with Jim, N6TJ. Here is an excerpt: ""If, as you and others, suggest contesting is such a small part of CQ then, why not suggest to them to ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00175.html (11,318 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC on CW (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:29:29 -0000
Today I attempted to make a posting concerning the FCC Notice of Proposed Rule-making(NPRM) to eliminate the code requirement for obtaining an Amateur Radio license, thereby killing CW contesting. Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00347.html (10,186 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:45:34 -0000
Well Warren here's the answer: This is the original posting on July 16 on this subject, by me. ""This is an excerpt from the weekly ARRL Letter. It has taken awhile to get rolling but it is working v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00459.html (13,748 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:44:10 -0000
The military did not issue licenses/calls at KR6. I went to the American Consulate office in Naha Okinawa to get my personal call/license and to change the status of our club station and become the t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00498.html (13,476 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] AA log submission (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:28:50 -0000
SOAPBOX: Cabrillo Format not yet implemented for this contest END-OF-LOG: CT users are stuck using the manual robot at JARL. I don't blame K1EA for not including Cabrillo for AA because it's not supp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00625.html (11,693 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Everyone" knows CT... (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:42:12 -0000
WHAT..??.. Just for the record I became a registered user of CT around 1987 and was contesting for @20 years prior to that. Prior to CT I was logging by hand, (what a revolting concept). I recently h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00634.html (11,732 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] AA log submission (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:58:18 -0000
Referring to my original posting I said: ""This complaint has been made many times over the years, many times, and seems to fall on deaf ears in Japan."" I will go so far as to predict, unless JARL c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00650.html (9,733 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Everyone uses CT (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 21:33:34 -0000
Gee excuse me if I'm not surprised by N6TR's response. I will take issue with it though. How many multi-multi networked stations are there, 10 or 12. My guess would be around 1% of the total contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00652.html (10,964 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Networks (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:17:14 -0000
Well here I go again for about the 100th time. The best spotting network is you sitting in front of your receiver finding stations to work and then working them. If you need to use spotting networks
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00698.html (11,025 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station-Specific Incentives (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:31:10 -0000
Be careful about who you use as an example. When he went to XF4 in the late 80's he promised T-shirts to anyone who worked them all bands 160-2(satellite). I have the cards but still waiting for the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00712.html (10,171 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remember, this is suppose to be fun (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 23:14:32 -0000
Patrick I don't think there has been that much negativity. It's like every year at this time, the doldrums between major contests. It happens every year and usually goes away as fast as it came. How
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00729.html (9,413 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] W1AW/5 (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 22:17:37 -0000
Anyone have any idea who the operator was at W1AW/5 at 1300Z on 3798(DX-Window)? He didn't have a clue what kind of problem he was creating and that reflects poorly on W1AW. W1AW/5 was in full sunlig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00740.html (7,532 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Off Times (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 03:54:03 -0000
Let's do some simple math. 4 minutes X(times) 3 Q's per minute = 12 Q's(minimum)... Yes sir I'll gladly take a 1 or 2 Q penalty to sneak in extra minutes. Where do I sign up ?????? MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00780.html (9,436 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Methods or Equipment? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:35:53 -0000
There are a bunch of answers to your question: First UP4L's QSO rate was @67/hr yours was 12. 12 Q's/hr won't get you anything in any contest. I'm not being mean I'm being honest. You need to get exp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00824.html (12,871 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:04:23 -0000
This is an excerpt from the weekly ARRL Letter. It has taken awhile to get rolling but it is working very well. I've heard a lot of moaning and groaning because it's to complicated or to time consumi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00826.html (9,650 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 03:37:09 -0000
How about this: In place of complaining to me, and the entire list, why not contact Wayne Mills, N7NG, directly with the problem. Since LOTW started I've had a couple of e-mail exchanges with Wayne a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00845.html (12,870 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 18:51:50 -0000
You made an excellent point Bill. W1AW/5 & NU1AW have finished with their logs because they have made their 'BRAG' to 3830 so why haven't the logs been uploaded to LOTW? The rosters of both stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00855.html (10,815 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu