- 1. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Solicitations (score: 1)
- Author: n7rx@arrl.net (N7RX)
- Date: Tue Feb 6 11:09:34 2001
- As someone who traffics in rule interpretation for a living, I alway find these 6 or so threads a year very entertaining. Anyway, I understand the QSY rule as written perfectly well and the people wh
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00050.html (7,292 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] OOs as Referees (score: 1)
- Author: n7rx@arrl.net (N7RX)
- Date: Fri Feb 9 16:20:25 2001
- Although I don't think its necessary that refs be OOs, the advantage of using OOs is that they have been trained in general regulatory matters. Contest rules violations should include regulatory infr
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00071.html (8,871 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Contest ears (score: 1)
- Author: n7rx@arrl.net (N7RX)
- Date: Wed Mar 14 17:20:38 2001
- Absolutely. I just bought a Mark V and I am unpersuaded that its any better than my old IC765. I've been finding that I can process the audio bandwidth on the 765 better than the M5's DSP gadgetry b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00221.html (7,784 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu