Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n7rx@arrl.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Solicitations (score: 1)
Author: n7rx@arrl.net (N7RX)
Date: Tue Feb 6 11:09:34 2001
As someone who traffics in rule interpretation for a living, I alway find these 6 or so threads a year very entertaining. Anyway, I understand the QSY rule as written perfectly well and the people wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00050.html (7,292 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] OOs as Referees (score: 1)
Author: n7rx@arrl.net (N7RX)
Date: Fri Feb 9 16:20:25 2001
Although I don't think its necessary that refs be OOs, the advantage of using OOs is that they have been trained in general regulatory matters. Contest rules violations should include regulatory infr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00071.html (8,871 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Contest ears (score: 1)
Author: n7rx@arrl.net (N7RX)
Date: Wed Mar 14 17:20:38 2001
Absolutely. I just bought a Mark V and I am unpersuaded that its any better than my old IC765. I've been finding that I can process the audio bandwidth on the 765 better than the M5's DSP gadgetry b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00221.html (7,784 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu