Mail Archive Search: <+from:n9qqk@urbancom.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n9qqk@urbancom.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1): Author: n9qqk@urbancom.net; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:18:18 -0500; Dave. If peer pressure brought about by your statistics causes some packet cheaters to mend their ways, then you should be commended for your efforts. However, when you start talking about DQ'ing bas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00345.html (8,683 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] Aren't M/Ms annoying? (score: 1): Author: n9qqk@urbancom.net; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:10:52 -0600; How does he "tell them" without being OUT OF BAND HIMSELF? -Ron, N9QQK -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00389.html (8,821 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] OK RTTY test (or not?) (score: 1): Author: n9qqk@urbancom.net; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 22:04:25 -0600; Turned on the radio a half hour ago (Dec 20 00:20Z), and heard JA1BNW calling "CQ OK-RTTY". Worked him, and decided to play. Found a freq and started calling "CQ OK TEST" worked 7 JA's and VR2BG, get; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00420.html (7,659 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: n9qqk@urbancom.net; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 05:58:14 -0500; the CQWW CW and Phone? I would think that it had to do the number of rtty operators that were out there when they made up the rules. They probably thought that allowing domestic Q's would greatly in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00299.html (8,207 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]