- 41. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
- Author: "Nat Heatwole" <nat@ajheatwole.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:20:26 -0500
- This is not true. See http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/2005-January/060131.html and look at #3. 73! Nat WZ3AR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list C
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00061.html (9,027 bytes)
- 42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS? (score: 1)
- Author: "Nat Heatwole" <nat@ajheatwole.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:45:19 -0500
- It was a very different story for SS SSB this year. Look at all of those QSOs on 160m: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/3830/2005-11/msg01389.html Although I've never seen a 3830 score repor
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00448.html (8,054 bytes)
- 43. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesters & CQ-Contest (score: 1)
- Author: "Nat Heatwole" <nat@ajheatwole.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:50:30 -0400
- Great post, John! Along these lines, here are some of my all-time favorite CQ-Contest posts: Beware the DVP! (N6TR) - http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-03/msg00040.html Don't
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00327.html (11,452 bytes)
- 44. Re: [CQ-Contest] 48 hour straight contest operation and human output (score: 1)
- Author: "Nat Heatwole" <nat@ajheatwole.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:44:54 -0400
- I seem to recall that KQ2M stayed in the chair for 24 hours straight during an IARU contest several years back. I don't know how Bob handled calls of nature during the contest (or even if nature call
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00318.html (9,580 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu