Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ne0p@lcisp.com: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 03:09:43 -0000
Hi Bob, I am not sure what rig comes closest to the TS870 today. Probably the Icom 756PRO if you are looking at HF in general. In the Kenwood lineup it would be the TS2000. 73s John NE0P have comes h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00931.html (19,939 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC on CW (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:05:26 -0000
I can see the FCC soon eliminating the CW subbands. The FCC has already stated (not in these exact words) that CW is no longer important, and the NPRM is closer to W5YI's petition than the ARRL's. W5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00963.html (12,685 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:06:21 -0000
And the dead years had the 756PRO series. -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.net> To: "KE5CTY Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net> Cc: "'David Thompson'" <thompson@mindspring.com>; "'CQ Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00964.html (11,556 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW) (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:07:28 -0000
And reason 4 is that CW works much better on Aurora propagation once you get to 2 meters and above. I have heard SSB once on 2 meter aurora and it was virtually uncopyable. 73s John NE0P ____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00965.html (11,244 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:07:50 -0000
I think the majority of them run just fine. That is one problem with the internet. If someone has a problem with their rig, they repeated post it for all to see. Those who don't have any problems rar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00975.html (16,140 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW) (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:16:16 -0000
Where is it written that everyone should become a ham? We seem to have this idea that we need to get as many hams as possible, so are willing to sacrifice quality for quantity. Most people will never
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00976.html (10,920 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] Icom 756PRO as contest rig (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:17:39 -0000
I have seen some very good prices recently on used Icom 756PROs, and wonder how they do as contest rigs? This is not the II or III model, just the straight PRO. The QST review gave kind of mixed mess
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00274.html (7,351 bytes)

28. [VHFcontesting] Expected life of coax (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:50:37 -0000
What is the life expectancy of Coax (type 9913 superflex and RG-213) in a high UV environment like Oklahoma? And how can I tell when it is time to replace it? 73s John NE0P __________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00277.html (7,586 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: [Yaesu_FT-1000MP] FT-1000MP Mark-V/Field andFT-847to be discontinued (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 23:18:55 -0000
The 847 should have been discontinued before it was ever released 73s John NE0P _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00395.html (10,627 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] Most interesting band (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:07:59 -0000
Here is a topic for the list that I haven't seen covered here before: What do you consider to be the most interesting HF band propagationwise? For me, it is 15 meters, although there isn't much propa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00400.html (6,966 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Longest Callsign Possible? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:51:25 -0000
YY0YYY? YY0QQQ? YY0JJJ? JJ0JJJ, JJ0QQQ, JJ0YYY or some combination thereof for CW. 73s John NE0P _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00157.html (8,056 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Longest Callsign Possible? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:36:03 -0500
If we want to go the other way, I remember working at least two 2 x 0 calls back in the early to mid 80s during contests. One was TU73 which was my first TU station ever worked, so I have his QSL as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00166.html (10,780 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] Best rigs on low band noise (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:46:44 -0000
Which radios are the best at handling and eliminating low band (80-40m) noise-both man made and natural? Interested in ones in the $1300 and less range. I am sure that the Icom 7800 or Yaesu FTDX9000
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00228.html (7,092 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking for possibly busted calls (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:56:00 -0000
J3YBB is probably JA3YBB. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00018.html (8,064 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] A portable rig that would serve well forcontestingtoo? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:18:29 -0500
That is a good suggestion for a portable rig that will do nicely on HF. A used Yaesu FT890 would also be nice as it has the built in tuner (which is supposed to match about anything) as well as the b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00041.html (10,340 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking for possibly busted calls (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:59:36 -0500
Was doing it from memory and couldn't remember if it was JA3YBB or JJ3YBB. I will admit that the latter did seem to seem more right to me at the time, but the JA3 seemed like a more used prefix. I ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00044.html (10,931 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] Worst contesting location? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:36:20 -0000
I know that the best contest location has been discussed many times before, and I seem to remember that EA8 came out on top. But here is a twist on this-what is the worst contesting location, based o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00327.html (7,214 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW observations (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:51:40 -0000
I was surprised at the level of 160 activity for the contest this year. Seemed better than last year, and quite a few ops were able to pull out my terrible signal. Glad to see the top band is becomin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00329.html (9,458 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worst contesting location? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:17:46 -0600
And didn't Shackelton or Byrd describe South Sandwich as the worst place on earth? I agree that they would not be very good places to operate from in general. However, in a contest they might be rare
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00344.html (11,862 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worst contesting location? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:16:00 -0600
I agree that any location in the polar zones is tough. I had thought of JW, OX, and R1FJ, but figured that their proximity to Europe would offset that a bit contestwise. In the southern polar zones y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00346.html (9,832 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu