Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:neil.goodell@myfairpoint.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Neil & Heather <neil.goodell@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:05:37 -0500
As a Younger, less experienced contester, I'm caught in the catch-22 of which is right and proper. General consensus is that saving precious time is more valued that protocol... after all,it is a con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00099.html (11,854 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: W1CTN DISPATCH ARRL CW Score - AKA when contesting goes bad :) (score: 1)
Author: Neil & Heather <neil.goodell@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:24:16 -0500
Agreed! Great read..Thanks!! 73 Neil, AE1P _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00253.html (8,039 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why is he ashamed...my opinion (score: 1)
Author: Neil Goodell Jr <neil.goodell@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:26:08 -0500
Agree with Arnie, 100%. I will also add, if I worked you in the SS tests,and You did not include your call-sign in the exchange, I did not log you. Regardless of how many precious seconds it takes to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00276.html (8,014 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu