Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn3w@cox.net: 154 ]

Total 154 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 00:08:21 -0500
Remember, this is not a petition to the FCC. This seems like an open ended petition directed at contest sponsors (e.g., the ARRL and CQ). Mind you, that the petition would eventually like to influenc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00075.html (10,152 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:56:35 -0500
Hah, well it appears at the MMSN petition folks are busy deleting posts and commentary critical of the petition. Excellent! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00123.html (16,406 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:25:41 -0500
I'd say you have 6 contests where conflict is likely... ARRL DX WPX RDXC WAE CQWW Sweeps 73 Rich NN3W -- Original Message -- From: "Tom Haavisto" <kamham69@gmail.com> To: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00223.html (13,053 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:56:16 -0500
You also need to remember that the scoring analysis is done with prior operating habits and rules in mind. For example, I don't consciously work more than 1 K station on each band except to grab the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00338.html (10,637 bytes)

145. [CQ-Contest] RAC Winter contest (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:47:56 -0500
Since its going to be a locked up in the house type of weekend, I might as well get on for the RAC Winter contest. Does everybody work everyody with the knowledge that non-VE QSOs are worth only 2 po
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00438.html (6,636 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] need Dayton room (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 07:53:18 -0500
the standard alternate is the Double Tree which is about 2 blocks off. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00008.html (7,416 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] AN OPEN LETTER TO THE CQ CONTEST COMMITTEE (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:34:41 -0800
I fully agree with Tonno. I've done both SOHP assisted and unassisted - with the #1 SOAB in 2006, the #2 SOAB on 2007 and the #1 SOAB(A) in 2008. My score in 36 hours in 2008 - assisted - was basical
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00263.html (11,228 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] USA stations in ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:09:14 -0500
I am not sure that they know better. Many times I will listen to the ham calling me, and he is either a mobile or a 2x3 call. You can't presume that there is malice intended and I think its not a goo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00355.html (10,984 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW from All 40 Zones (KE3X) (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:57:42 -0500
yes, n6zz did. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00046.html (7,922 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band Edges (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:13:06 -0500
Hi Rick. Owing to work commitments, I too am sidelined this year. Been going and down the band spotting folks, and have noticed some folks waaay too close to the edges. We really need to clean up thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00102.html (9,155 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 23:35:15 -0400
Thats not correct. ARRL DX received 5800 logs in 2009 versus 3506 for RDXC... 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00076.html (8,606 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] : RE: RDXC (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:12:21 -0800
Multiply the QSO count by 2 to get what? A 48 hour count? If so, thats not valid since, under normal conditions, there is almost always fewer QSOs to be made on Day 2. A more realistic factor would b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00083.html (10,299 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 10:48:59 -0400
As to receive antennas, I'd allow for 1 beverage or for a combination of smaller, compact antennnas (K9AY, pennant, etc). 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest maili
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00077.html (13,008 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] AO8HQ vs DA0HQ - ARRL did the worse in two decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 20:53:16 -0400
Jose, I too like IARU, but I think the HQ competition routine is becoming, frankly, stupid. Dozens of HQ stations spread across the band, acting as CQ monsters for a full 24 hours. I also think the v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00137.html (11,851 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu