Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn4x@embarqmail.com: 76 ]

Total 76 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] VP2KC History Question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:07:02 -0500
Recently, I tripped across some stories about VP2KC's 1979 contest efforts. I was still a newbie back then, and not well connected to the contest scene. Whatever happened to that station, post 1979?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00337.html (6,646 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:31:29 -0400
Ed - I'd submit to you that "sharing your successes" is fine when it's VOLUNTARY - otherwise, I rather consider it akin to a quasi-government seizure of proprietary trade secrets. If someone knows ab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00204.html (8,226 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:40:43 -0400
The year was 1988. The date: CQWW Phone, 00:00Z. I was in my own home in the flatlands of Somerset, NJ, having moved from my parent's place high on a hillside with an awesome shot to EU, AF, and SA i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00152.html (10,072 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww etiquette (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:46:23 -0500
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00492.html (7,480 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:30:34 -0500
This kind of thing really does reinforce my thought that we should just go to a MMOG ("Massively Multiplayer Online Game"), at least for the CW contests. Someday, the technology will be there for pho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00124.html (10,648 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] THE BIGGEST DAMN STUD ON THE AIR! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:02:09 -0500
This guy has a generally pretty interesting blog, but he's way out of line on this column, titled: THE BIGGEST DAMN STUD ON THE AIR!" http://rfblog.lbagroup.com/the-biggest-damn-stud-on-the-air/ [SNI
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00276.html (8,162 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] RV: Country File errata from CQWW 2011 CW (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:29:42 -0500
I remember once, a long time ago, someone argued that the zone was "implied" by their callsign, and so rationalized that as the reason you could insert the correct zone into their QSO exchange. I tho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00524.html (8,950 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Keyboard for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:36:16 -0400
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00193.html (7,372 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:08:11 -0400
I am shocked, SHOCKED to find that SOME stations are using electricity generated in an entirely different country/entity to power their radios! How is it that they are allowed to turn that foreign en
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00169.html (10,548 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:45:07 -0400
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00225.html (7,584 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 08:05:35 -0400
While I agree with the rule, it *does* kind of throw a monkey wrench into Field Day plans, doesn't it? 73, Steve NN4X EL98jh _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00239.html (8,643 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:26:54 -0400
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00242.html (9,014 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do I need to operate assisted to figure out the calls? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:00:55 -0400
When I run across a station who refuses to ID, I make up an exotic callsign, and use that when I work them: [NON-IDing STATION] : QRZ [ME] : NN4X [NON-IDing STATION] : NN4X 599 15 [ME] : ZA1XX de NN4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00387.html (11,333 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] Contest Station Improvements? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 10:03:43 -0400
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00146.html (6,506 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: Re: Non-Assisted vs. Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:59:04 -0500
Does anyone anymore, you know, like, put up antennas and hook up new rigs and stuff, and just have a great time working other stations? 73, Steve NN4X _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00348.html (7,411 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sunday afternoon boredom is the wet blanket on SS (was Rules off the table ?) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:22:45 -0500
Perhaps the problem is that Sweeps is too long? Someone commented that allowing stations to switch to a second call sign would be "gaming the system". First of all, for a serious high-score-seeking s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00140.html (12,241 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Sundays (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:48:32 -0500
How about breaking SS into two parts: "Saturday SS" and "Sunday SS"? This would reset the clock, and also allow folks to try to sweep wins on both days. I don't really have a dog in this hunt; the la
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00204.html (8,104 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Sundays (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:38:23 -0500
Why have a simple solution when a complicated one will do? ;-) Let's take a page from the Stew Perry contest, and have variable points awarded, except instead of for distance (how last-century is THA
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00264.html (9,432 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] RBN, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:22:04 -0500
You know what I'm super happy about? I am super happy, and grateful for those folks who've given their time and financial support to create and maintain the RBN. I've been playing with the "Signal Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00445.html (6,709 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Worldwide SDR Recording (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:37:55 -0500
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00123.html (6,608 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu