Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nss@mwt.net: 811 ]

Total 811 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] Host A Rookie, but ... (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:52:06 -0500
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00367.html (8,946 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:11:19 -0500
Agreed! Just like the instant logging on the new contest from the ARRL the Rookie Roundup. Unless you have the internet, too bad, youre not welcome in this contest. Sad when Radio has to have wires t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00127.html (11,792 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:25:32 -0500
No I agree also, I have no problem with the spotting system of any kind. What I DO have a problem with is a trend that you MUST have the internet to be in a contest if you want to send in the results
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00136.html (17,668 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:56:07 -0500
Ok, This will be the last of me on this subject of contesting and having the internet be a requirement to participate. Remember i made reference to my section manager saying that he flelt it was un r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00141.html (22,752 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] Unwanted callers and QSL cards (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:33:02 -0500
I'd log them,, anyway, the software if it's worth anything should just ignore the Q anyway, yet you still have a record of the Q for this very situation, and as many have said it's far faster to work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00185.html (9,464 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:48:53 -0500
Really? You would have given up years ago? I am just curious as to why? I've been a ham since 1975, and a contester just as long. First contest was Novenmber Sweepstakes of 75, been hooked ever since
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00199.html (11,403 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:15:58 -0500
I 100% Agree! How about this another analogy: To a Pure contester where no clusters, or skimmers, or spotting networks, tune the big knob to find stations = body builder A contester that uses all thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00224.html (11,752 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer/Packet/Internet Spotting Affects Everyone (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:23:53 -0500
That's how contests in the past were. Or at least that's how I remember them being when I started contesting. Dupes were a BAD thing and you DID get penalized for having any! Not just a percentage, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00226.html (8,924 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:25:36 -0500
No see that is still all in the chain between me, logging, my radio, antennas, and RF. And thats good too. And In my opinion you probably have some better skills, than those that do not. I mean reall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00249.html (15,646 bytes)

90. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:50:59 -0500
When we first in the club decided to go for a vanity call to aid of course in contesting. We had to get rid of the old call it was terrible.! KC9OMQ YUK! can it get much longer? and phonetics? Yikes!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00314.html (11,472 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:10:10 -0500
I still hate the slash at the beginning instead of the end like it used to be. still makes better sense in a flow way. If I'm operating in Puerto Rico, I'm WB9SBD/KP4 Whiskey Bravo Nine Sierra Bravo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00334.html (10,648 bytes)

92. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:38:52 -0500
Right and until recently it was that way WB9SBD operating in Puerto Rico. Now it's Puerto Rico, operating as WB9SBD The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com __
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00348.html (12,526 bytes)

93. [CQ-Contest] Morserunner (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:27:48 -0500
What is the difference between the two morserunners? Joe WB9SBD -- The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com _______________________________________________ CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00350.html (6,384 bytes)

94. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:51:33 -0500
Right,, WB9SBD/KP4 DOES SAY THAT WB9SBD IS PORTABLE IN PUERTO RICO sorry caplock. Thats how it was 30 years ago. And someone sent me the FCC rules too and even in there no where does it say to put it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00351.html (10,148 bytes)

95. Re: [CQ-Contest] Morserunner (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:27:40 -0500
That's what i thought also, but when you go to the download page http://www.dxatlas.com/Download.asp There are two versions. And was just wondering what the differences were. Other than the one that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00355.html (8,183 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] Are contesters born or made? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 13:50:21 -0500
I agree Both. Born and made, You need to have a competitive gene in you to put yourself through this tourture because it's fun. Just like a marathoner. It hurts so why do we do i? because it's fun. w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00085.html (10,474 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 08:28:58 -0500
I agree, I have played with them, and find no advantage at all to using them anyway. Yes I know and do code ok, regular QSO speed 25 to 30 WPM, Contest speed? who knows he he he,, but the level of ab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00201.html (9,821 bytes)

98. [CQ-Contest] Abbreviations? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 11:03:33 -0500
Is there some place where the abbreviations used in the scores are explained? Some of course are very clear. but others are hmmmm? like in this string, USA SO(A)AB(TS) HP What does it say? Joe WB9SBD
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00258.html (7,186 bytes)

99. Re: [CQ-Contest] Abbreviations? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 16:23:35 -0500
Ok, that was some help, But I did already guess some of them like in that example USA SO(A)AB(TS) HP USA- Duh in the USA SO- Single Operator (A)- Assisted? like in packet clusters or what? AB- All Ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00264.html (7,562 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:25:54 -0500
Actually I always thought reflector is a better fit. A reflector reflects back something. a list is a number or group, ( of e mail addresses) In your E-Mail program you can have a list but not a refl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00009.html (8,291 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu