Bottom line...... Whoever is using the frequency first is the one that gets it. If someone is operating on that frequency and is asked to qsy for a net that is about to start...it is up to the operat
Antennas.....antennas.....antennas. On the other hand just talk to Ed, N1UR about LP contesting without even having a tower up (yet). He has done well and his antennas are supported on ladders and tr
I will be in between these three cities over the next several days with my so to speak base camp being in Lincoln, CA. Will I be in the area of any of you big-time contesters? Drop me a note direct.
Seems the only cure for 40m is the day when we here in the USA do not have to worry about split! 73, Bob NX5M (Almost fully operational again after storm damage) almost -- The world's top contesters
I dialed around 15m for a few minutes today to work some of the CA guys. Many places across the band I was getting some cruddy noise which I figured was a broadcast station with a runny nose. I final
Keep them in the log. You can still submit for a cw category. This way those stations you worked on the "other" mode will not end up with a NIL when the logs are checked. If I am correct on this, the
I observed several of these guys on earlier today. Highest frequency I found was 28255 although I have heard thim at 28605 before. Seems to me that these guys have to be close to some ham somewhere.
Just a curiosity question. Now that CQWW DX Contest results are available on the web and all the certificates have been sent to those who earned them........should we also expect the same with the CQ
Operator running cw here at my place Friday night (10m test) reported having a DL call in and working him on a southwest path. I do not recall the exact time this qso was made but off the top of my h
I think it might be time to just do away with the packet assisted category and let everyone do whatever they want. You either have it or you dont and if you dont have it you need to find a way to get
Good point Hans. peek _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
I do not have a schematic of the dvp card but I do have a pinout schematic from 1992. It is for a Yaesu. I could take a picture of it and send it to whoever needs it. Bob NX5M instructions came bound
As long as the serial number sent matches what the other station copied all is well. If you remove qsos from other bands from your log the stations you worked are going to get a NIL (Not In Log). So
Serial numbers by band are ok in any of the multi classes. I say this because I asked. In multi-two, which is what we were going to do here until we ended up with an operator shortage, it was confirm
You are ok with Wintest doing that as long as the cabrillo log file is indicating which transmitter made each qso. Consider this: Would it not be somewhat silly to send a serial number on a band that
That is a valid score. I was not reporting the band qsos and mults because it is redundant. Single-band contest....why bother? But I did just do it so it will show up. _______________________________
There ya go Kelly.....that is exactly what I was going to say. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
I guess I will jump in here. He has given me a headache more times that I care to remember, even in a casual event such as the Texas QP. I have tried to avoid this area of 20m but I remember one time
Too much sugar in my opinion. A Dr. Pepper, M&M's and Frosted Mini Wheats accomplished the same thing for me. Of course I have milk on the side with my mini wheats....it just has a better taste. Are
Or maybe the first "dit" was being lost in the initial key-up. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li