For stations in the USA this will be not so difficult award, but for overseas stations this will be a big challenge. Already working the stations, but also getting the confirmation. Of the 13608 USA
Joe Subich, W4TV schreef: Hamradio and contesting is a hobby, not a life. Comparing contest logs with account balances and other private things is a bit exaggerating. If the contest sponsor decides t
Thanks for summarizing. 74 logs from a small country as Netherlands, thats a winner on its own. :-) Henk PA5KT f.fucelli@pluspel.com schreef: _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
Link to last years rules: http://www.radio.ru/cq/contest/rule-results/index2.shtml wally schreef: _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com htt
You also cannot send in the log. That is not a violation, and you still have the contesting fun. And who cares about the results? They come a year later and nobody has access unless you are ARRL memb
I am not a user of writelog. I was also interesting in this so I looked at the website to give it a try. Unfortunately the website has not been updated for a while. There is no trial version availabl
My best scores even with most multipliers are in contest were I did Run most of the time. In 48 hours contests like the ARRL DX most of the multipliers come back to the cq's. In S&P just scanning the
The website doesnt look like its an updated and a supported program. Might be an idea for the programmer to update his website. Henk Mark Perrin schreef: _____________________________________________
I am looking for the results of the 2007 CQWW RTTY contest. The cqww website has only the 2006 results. Anyone knows a link to this? Would like to compare with last years results during the contest.
The transformer has connectors and can be disconnected. Would also advice to send the tubes seperate Henk PA5KT Tony Rogozinski schreef: _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
This weekend was the Scandinavian Activity Contest SSB. This is about the same as the ARRL DX for USA stations. Guess most scandinavian stations were in that contest. Robert Chudek - K0RC schreef: __
Ed K1EP schreef: Same story here, only I have choosen N1MM because it works the same as TRlog. I was not so happy with CT. -- Henk Remijn PA5KT email: pa5kt@remijn.net www: www.remijn.net ___________
The Vereniging voor Experimenteel Radio Onderzoek in Nederland (VERON) has the honour of inviting you to participate in the 54 th Dutch PACC Contest. The Dutch PACC Contest will be held on February 1
I would propose shorter deadlines, and not posting the logs received till after the deadline. BTW, with shorter deadline, it would be good if the organizing committee would publish the results earlie
AD5VJ Bob schreef: What I usually do after a big contest: (I operate from PI4Z which is 10 min drive from home) At 1 AM local time on Monday morning I pack my transceiver and other easy-to-steal equi
In the wpx contest the only mults are prefixes. A prefix is counted only once regardless of the number of times the same prefix is worked. Henk PA5KT David Pruett schreef: -- Henk Remijn PA5KT email:
This weekend I listened a while to the EU mess around K5D. Specially on 40m there was a lot of confusion because K5D listened down on CW, resulting in a lot of frustations to innocent PACC participan
K0HB schreef: Thats also would be good. Then the are a competitor, I already know my run frequency on all bands. :-) Just kidding. I got some comments on my remarks regarding VP6DX. I was referring t
All contests publish results online. Within approx. 6 months of the contest. The CQ-magazine sponsored contests were the only for which it is difficult to find the scores. Randy is doing a good job f
I was cq-ing around 7100, got almost no attention. For me the frequency sounded clear. I moved to the noisy 7099 and I got a pile up. Would be nice if USA station would also listen a bit higher then