Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pd2r.maarten@gmail.com: 121 ]

Total 121 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] A couple of post-CQWW observations (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
I really enjoyed this CQ WW contest. We participated in the M/2 category en made a little short of 5600 Q's We got spotted on the cluster once as being deaf. We had our 5 over 5 stack towards the US
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00396.html (10,009 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting versus cheerleading (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Am I missing something here? Stations from a different continent are worth 3 points and US stations 2. So wouldn't that make it your loss to? I'm not sure where I stand on this self spotting issue. Y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00397.html (8,375 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] What Happened on 10 Meters? (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Unless my English is letting me down, I don't think your statements are correct. This is what a found in the CQ WW SSB contest rules of 2009: VI. POINTS: 1. Contacts between stations on different con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00079.html (9,693 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] What Happened on 10 Meters? (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:21:33 -0800 (PST)
It's one thing to read the rules, it's another to understand them...:blush: In my own defence, I'm not a native speaker... But I am right about this one :-D My apologies to David. -- Member of the PI
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00099.html (9,364 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Rule (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:39:25 -0800 (PST)
He never said he participated in the M/S category. He only suggested to listen what these people (who actually participate in the M/S category) have to say about the rule change since it affects them
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00588.html (12,671 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Rule (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:58:48 -0800 (PST)
After my reply (posted above) I received 2 emails about this subject. I have nothing against receiving emails but I would like to keep the discussion on-line so everybody can join in. Personally I'd
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00042.html (7,853 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tesla cup (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:59:53 -0800 (PST)
The Tesla cup sounds interesting. But why is there no Multi Two entry? The M2 entry is getting more and more popular. You only have a Mulit Single entry were one can only use 1 transmitter, or the Mu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00375.html (9,936 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Clarity in contest categories. (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:01:36 -0800 (PST)
-- Maarten, PD2R Member of the PI4DX contest group www.pi4dx.com Elecraft K3 nr:1849 -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Clarity-in-contest-categories-tp4175343p4175575.html Sent fr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00405.html (8,838 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] PACC (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:59:32 -0800 (PST)
Dear Friends, We ,the Dutch ham communitie, hope to work you all this weekend during the Dutch PACC. More info on www.pacc.veron.nl. 73, Maarten van Rossum PD2R Member op the PI4DX contest group -- M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00071.html (7,196 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Computer Controlled Rigs. (score: 1)
Author: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Take a look at the K3. With macro's you can control the entire rig. You can even write the the programs to do it yourselve. On a simple level, I can control my digital voice keyer of the K3 with N1MM
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00318.html (8,935 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10M Multi Operator Category - A change? (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:22:04 +0100
Two transmitters on a single band is a challenge but certainly not impossible, especially if you use different modes. Adding a M/2 or M/S (2nd radio for mults only) category would certainly make it m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00128.html (9,440 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest consistency (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:14:17 +0100
Bob, It's a shame that a couple of emails can cause your blood pressure to rise. The good part is that you found an easy cure for you high blood pressure ;-) As a recent subscriber, a lot of these "m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00152.html (8,937 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Roofing filter improvements? (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:30:20 +0100
Sounds like a good rig to me. Those INRAD filters sure can change a mid level rig into something more usable. I had a FT 990 which wasn't a bad transceiver to start with. But after swapping the origi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00184.html (8,897 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary: Disruption of Emergency Communication during CQWW SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:37:16 +0100
Steve, we passed that station long time ago. We all concluded that most, if not all, contester would keep emergency QRG's clear *if they knew it was there.* Of course the best stations in the world w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00314.html (10,762 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best SS exchange yet! (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:14:16 +0100
LOL ;-) By the way, Some people get very creative with their call-sign's phonetics? I heard some guy refer to his last two letters of his call as "Backed Potato's" instead of Bravo Papa. I can't help
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00356.html (7,742 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best SS exchange yet! (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 01:20:07 +0100
I can imagine that it can be very effective if enough people know you by those phonetics. Just for the record, I didn't day the OM was juvenile, just the way that he pronounced his call *sounded* juv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00360.html (10,865 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best SS exchange yet! (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:38:55 +0100
OK, I have to admit, some of those call signs mentioned earlier are hilarious and certainly made me laugh. Let's see if I I can come up with something: PD2R could be "Pretty Devoted 2 Radio". I guess
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00417.html (11,076 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:59:18 +0100
Is it me or do most of those "cheerleaders" come roughly from the same part of the world? 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00028.html (15,980 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:18:55 +0100
Unfortunately for me I live on the other side of the pond and do have to live with this cr@p... I haven't given it much thought but now that the CQ WW committee is becoming more and more aggressive t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00048.html (9,382 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1st legal limit amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:39:41 +0100
My vote goes to the Acom 2000a. Great, reliable amplifier that will tune automatic and easily deliver US legal power limit. It also has a very effective protection circuitry, you would have to try ve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00241.html (9,201 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu