Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pete.n4zr@gmail.com: 158 ]

Total 158 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rate Record (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:13:58 -0400
Boy, it would be interesting to know who a few more (maybe top 10 by rate) of the runners-up were.  I don't normally contest on SSB, but did so for a few hours this past weekend, and was amazed by th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-10/msg00109.html (8,464 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] How to submit ARRL SS overlay entry? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 22:57:36 -0400
I raised this on the N1MM reflector a few days ago when I discovered that N1MM didn't offer the overlay, and was told that the new overlay *was* on the log submission page.  It's kind of infuriating
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00008.html (8,673 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contsting Endurance... (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:58:05 -0500
Funny, I was just reflecting on this the other day, when I ran out of gas in SS about 10 PM on Saturday - just the opposite of what one should do to score well.  Of course, I'm 82, my first SS was in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00039.html (12,144 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Endurance UP-Date (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 20:58:02 -0500
Joe, you could probably clarify things if you would just say whether or not you will profit from sales of these products. 73, Pete N4ZR It is just the results of an experiment I did. I havent been ab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00134.html (11,683 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] Overrlay Categories (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 21:55:13 -0500
I'm 82, been contesting since the 1954 SS, and really don't much care about a oldster overlay.  I get my kicks from the process of making lots of Qs for however long I can, and contributing them to m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-12/msg00020.html (9,302 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] Overrlay Categories (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 09:00:32 -0500
I'm skeptical about that, Mike - my peak time spent in a contest was CQWW back on the early 2000s, at about 37 hours.  I have trouble doing half that now - not the way to win, even if I had a station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-12/msg00023.html (10,623 bytes)

147. [CQ-Contest] Missing E-mail Addresses (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:27:58 -0500
During last weekend's 10-M contest, I worked a DL station who was loud but T8, with a pronounced buzz on his signal.  I went to e-mail him to tell him about it, but alas - no e-mail on any of the usu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-12/msg00084.html (6,751 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spot in ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:08:59 -0500
The reason I almost always operate Assisted is that (for me - YMMV) the frustration of tuning up and down the band, entering call after call in my logger only to find that it's a dupe, generally outw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00027.html (10,505 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spot in ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:11:27 -0500
Unfortunately, I've noticed that a lot of clusters still turn off RBN spots by default - I'm not opposed to having the option, but wonder how many juicy CW/RTTY QSOs are missed because people don't k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00028.html (11,312 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQMM DX Contest unwritten rule (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:26:31 -0500
Bizarre 73, Pete N4ZR When the results appeared, I saw that I had a score reduction of more than 9%. This is very high for me and much higher than the other stations around my score. I wrote to the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00090.html (8,704 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:41:13 -0500
Hi Barry - the difference is that the traditional cluster network relied on spots sent manually by individual stations also connected to a cluster.  The RBN, on the other hand, is over 200 nodes worl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00122.html (16,136 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 19:46:00 -0500
I would rank most of us below the Japanese when it comes to average operating etiquette, but it's worth remembering that particularly on the high bands callers often can't hear each other, and the "1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00137.html (9,622 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] K0SR Vindicated (Was "2024 ARRL DX CW Raw Scores - Is the LP Winner from MO - REALLY?) (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:53:23 -0500
Frankly, given the cluster of Remote Ham Radio sites with excellent antennas and full legal power in Maine, I am inclined to the belief that it is an ME vs MO ttpo.  RHR could surely clarify this fro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00009.html (11,993 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] Was "2024 ARRL DX CW Raw Scores - Is the LP Winner from MO - REALLY? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 20:52:12 -0500
Sure, but he's not the only one doing 2BSIQ.  That isn't enough to explain a win from MO.  I shouldn't have called it a "typo", but why doesn't the op himself tell the world which MO station he was o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00017.html (8,723 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:05:00 -0400
Looking at his last sentence, I don't think Rich is advocating against vaccination - exactly the contrary.  He seems to be saying it has worked for him and his mother, despite a variety of relatively
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00134.html (10,089 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do not rely on spots for copying callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:50:15 -0400
I don't think it's "either/or".  My contest operating these days is 100% CW, all assisted (99 percent RBN) and almost all S&P - but I'm acutely aware of the risk of bad spots.  On CW, these days, bad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-04/msg00030.html (13,233 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN System? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 21:36:00 -0400
I'm not aware of any minimum speed, but suspect that at slow speeds, hand-sent CW may vary from the ideal often enough so that Skimmer will get confused.  Joe, if you want to experiment and have the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-09/msg00010.html (7,803 bytes)

158. Re: [CQ-Contest] AI for SSB RBN (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:41:27 -0500
I'm not super tekky, but I doubt that AI recognition of SSB callsigns is likely on typical ham PCs. 73, Pete N4ZR I do hope that most readers of this group realized that my suggesting using AI do dec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-11/msg00018.html (8,158 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu