Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:peter@salmark.co.uk: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK CQWW checklog (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 06:31:14 +0000
And that was likely the reason no action was taken the first year this station failed to produce a recording. The second year running, though, he had a year to plan how to comply with the rule and fa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00095.html (10,882 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:27:23 +0000
It really doesn't matter what you think about what a recording may or may not prove. It's part of the rules. You knew it was part of the rules because of the previous year. You chose to ignore it. Yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00124.html (11,061 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:13:06 +0000
Apologies if I've mixed people up. Nobody can answer the question about what happens if the audio fails. Why should that make any difference to the rule? Many things can go wrong, you just have to de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00128.html (14,489 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] what is required of recevied audio, and whay will it show? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:24:35 +0000
It would likely show all of those things. It should be easy to spot the difference between assisted and unassisted operation with a full recording. Since the requirement is for all audio that the ope
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00189.html (9,784 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] My need re contests to self spot (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:47:10 +0100
Not sure what there is to deal with - your MO breaks the rules so you don't enter. Sounds like you've dealt with it already. Peter G4MJS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00171.html (9,118 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Contest Committee comments on audio recordings (was MM3AWD) (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:18:52 +0000
Can I just point out that it would be unwise to believe unquestioningly the version of events provided by the original poster here. Peter G4MJS I agree Ron. What other sport/activity just DQ's you or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00051.html (15,576 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Contest Committee comments on audio recordings (was MM3AWD) (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 20:23:18 +0000
Father and son. Peter G4MJS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00075.html (11,450 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu