- 1. 160 Meter DX Window (score: 1)
- Author: phil.finkle@sid.net (phil.finkle@sid.net)
- Date: Wed Nov 22 10:43:22 1995
- Was just reading rules for CQWW 160 meter contest. They make a big case out of staying out of the 1830 to 1835 DX window. 160 has 2 full megahertz of bandwidth. Why can't we allocate 15 or 20 kHz (in
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-11/msg00127.html (14,890 bytes)
- 2. 160 (score: 1)
- Author: phil.finkle@sid.net (phil.finkle@sid.net)
- Date: Wed Nov 22 16:18:48 1995
- Warren, N2BCC, was kind enough to point out that I got carried away. 160 meters is 200 kHz not 2 mHz! Shows how the misactions affect me - I can't even count! 73, Phil K6EID
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-11/msg00135.html (5,948 bytes)
- 3. CAC Address? (score: 1)
- Author: phil.finkle@sid.net (phil.finkle@sid.net)
- Date: Sat Dec 2 10:48:03 1995
- Would someone pse pass on the W1 CAC who put the info on the DX window for this weekend's 160M contest? I checked the window a few minutes three different times last night and have a list of nine US
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-12/msg00006.html (10,050 bytes)
- 4. TEST (score: 1)
- Author: phil.finkle@sid.net (phil.finkle@sid.net)
- Date: Sun Dec 17 14:33:19 1995
- Amen!!!! A fwew months ago K5ZD was on the cover of CQ and posted the article that should have run with it. Today I got the January CQ with K5VT's picture and no station description at all. When will
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-12/msg00146.html (17,736 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu