Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:prickler.schneider@t-online.de: 208 ]

Total 208 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW SSB 2017 Effective DQ (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:44:35 +0100
Patiently reading the thread I'm still interested in the fundamental point whether there are any competition rules out in the sports world that state different rules for participants only based on th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00009.html (9,856 bytes)

202. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW SSB 2017 Effective DQ (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 06:36:23 +0100
Am 02.02.2018 um 00:07 schrieb Ria Jairam: Elites in the NYC marathon have a different start time and are actually in a class of their own. But as a clearly defined group prior to the start. We are l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00012.html (8,772 bytes)

203. [CQ-Contest] WRTC qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 08:56:04 +0200
Learned so much about US condx issues that I nearly forgot about the money and time issues around the qualification scheme. Am not convinced that "networking" to access big stations is the solution.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00113.html (8,416 bytes)

204. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending 'test' (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:27:35 +0100
It allows to discern whether the callsign just heard as tailend belongs to the CQ-ing station = to be called after "test" or belongs to someone calling the CQing station = not to be called (when no "
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00184.html (8,662 bytes)

205. Re: [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 22:01:34 +0100
As this is a list to learn especially for the many silent readers I'm really interested in an explanation about Am 04.12.2018 um 16:17 DXer wrote: The zombie bots out there are modifications. They ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00037.html (8,568 bytes)

206. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 11:33:41 +0100
From the sideline: Do will still speak about a hobby or are we close to bring in FBI and the likes for spot fraud investigations? 73, Chris DL8MBS Am 04.12.2021 um 22:26 schrieb Martin, LU5DX: How do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00037.html (9,570 bytes)

207. [CQ-Contest] It is more than (self) spots ;-) (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 22:27:10 +0100
As were are told to embrace tech changes, some potential issues to deal with: Diminishing latency on livestreams as second QSO channel; trying to better game FB's algorithm; discussing on the reflect
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-02/msg00133.html (7,560 bytes)

208. Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 07:33:14 +0100 (CET)
Other idea is exchange 59(9) 2402 and submitting either checklog or no log. The operator on the other side - whose opinions and positions are unknown - won't get penalized when going with "log what w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-03/msg00052.html (9,692 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 208
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This search system is powered by Namazu