Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:prickler.schneider@t-online.de: 208 ]

Total 208 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:07:55 +0200
Or as well by the organizers of the EU-sprint and I never heard of complaints and any nitpicking. I guess there won&acute;t be great interest in small logs other than by other fellow submitters of sm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00222.html (8,870 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] Operation times in WWDX (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:49:46 +0200
Hello, the open logs of CQ WWDX will allow for a lot of analyzes of all kind. Of course also for looking at the operation time of participants. Until now such figures have been available only for the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00486.html (10,081 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] Operation times - effect of off-time definition (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:09:03 +0200
Hello, for the recently posted calculation of WWDX-operation-times (http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/2007-June/074629.html) the software calculated every period longer than 10 minutes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00022.html (8,740 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] CW-Contesters operate longer (Op-times WWDX) (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:08:13 +0200
Hello, part two of WWDX 06-Operation-time statistics, now with the CW-leg (agn tnx to Michael, DL6MHW, for calculating the times with his software): 2651 Single Operator Allband logs done Average Op-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00085.html (8,478 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW hours of operation: analysis (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:26:49 +0200
As much as I admire the magic of sunspots I don&acute;t believe in their potential to make family commitments and activities of everyday life disappear. (And who really wants to experience family and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00168.html (8,645 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] [ARRL-LOTW] LoTW - contesting (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:00:04 +0100
IMHO QSLing stations have this benefit - or for what reason should I prefer a "LOTW-only" station if I&acute;m hunting counties? LOTW with its actual narrow focus is not yet an alternative to real QS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00484.html (7,601 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:35:14 +0100
The real sports seemingly don&acute;t know this - or why are there "Nanny"-like weight-categories i.e. in boxing? Would it be a compromise to add the relevant information (SOxR, op-hours, basic anten
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00539.html (8,268 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating problems and their solutions (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:29:36 +0100
Bad those "few" (really few?) would allow for another kind of death of the competetive hobby in the same way doping does effectively for professional sports like cycling, weight lifting or 100m-sprin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00357.html (10,914 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW and contest submissions (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:23:17 +0100
Any software-tweaking couldn&acute;t solve the basic problem for a real boost in acceptance: the limited spectrum of awards covered. If it is to deliver "matches" a narrow focus on two awards won&acu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00502.html (7,890 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:43:53 +0100
The spots are coming from his computer???? Where can I buy one of this machines? But this (strange) notion of a "truth machine" independent of people still feeding it seems to be associated with any
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00593.html (10,343 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating with Packet (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:06:26 +0100
Tom, I think it is unfair to denouce hams as whiners when they discuss cheating. Like many other small pistols I neither have won anything nor do I expect to win a contest with my setup. But I am nev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00621.html (9,027 bytes)

52. [CQ-Contest] SO2R - operating (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:37:51 +0100
May I try to break the techtalk-pileup with an operating question? I&acute;m looking for experience and tips about using SO2R for S&P on two bands simultaneously (using i.e. qrp or little antennas) -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00389.html (6,978 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer etc. (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:40:11 +0100
Will there be a last resort for those simply looking for the personal challenge in a competition? Spots, Skimmer etc. of course can&acute;t be stopped simply for their obvious convenience. We are tol
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00144.html (7,488 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] qrp-declaration... (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:47:57 +0100
If detecting cheaters by monitoring stations is an aim (a good one I think) why not better add a power designator to the exchange like H, L, Q (RDXA already being a contest with a REAL exchange)? It
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00265.html (9,651 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Move WPX Back to 30 Hours? (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:59:05 +0100
And I guess that "big" derives more from the voice-power and competetive standing of those than from their number. In WWDX CW 2006 (having no time limit) about 15 percent of the SOAB-participants ope
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00514.html (8,867 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Move WPX Back to 30 Hours? (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:35:03 +0100
Hopefully the organizers of the lively IOTA-contest with a 12h out of 24h-category donīt read this - it is so bad to know to be a victim of apocalyse... Irony off: Any time reduction should be in rec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00562.html (10,082 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Move WPX Back to 30 Hours? (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:39:39 +0100
Hopefully the organizers of the lively IOTA-contest with a 12h out of 24h-category donīt read this - it is so bad to know to be a victim of apocalypse... Irony off: Any time reduction should be in re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00564.html (9,457 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:22:19 +0200
How about that cure: everyone missing the RS aks for it before handing out any serial number. If enough people do it, the rate will drop... ;-) 73, Chris (www.dl8mbs.de) _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00009.html (7,657 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer musings (score: 1)
Author: prickler.schneider@t-online.de
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:23:15 +0200
Exactly in the same sense as marathon runners would feel threatend if engine driven wheel chairs were allowed in the same category - taking out the individual human challenge. But other than in runni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00456.html (8,785 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 07:48:30 +0200
Please, why would it be silly? It is only in the logic of tech development (with all the fine enthusiasm already at work in engineering skimmer setups quality will improve very quickly). All of us in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00035.html (8,129 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu